AI Rate Professor

English

Scott Covell

ENGL265 · ENGL101 · ENGL102 · ENG99 · ENG279 · ENG102 · ENG099ENG102 · ENGLISH · ENG · ENGL246 · ENG222 · ENGLISH102 · ENGL279 · ENG097ENG099 · ENG101 · ENG099 · ENG101102 · ENG095 · 176 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
88.89%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a memorable English , and revision.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent feedbackFunny but bluntRewrite-friendlyReading-heavyTough but fair
  • Most students strongly , and ability to improve writing.
  • The course is not a free A because reading, papers, participation, and effort matter.
  • Rewrites, , and office help make the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A grades , and , but many students say you must read, write, and work for the grade.

Online reviews mention and an easy final, while and tough grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The course is intellectually manageable but , and participation keep it from being easy.

Online reviews call the class not hard but sometimes slow, while and writing work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and comments repeatedly say showing up and participating matter.

Both online and in-person reviews include mandatory attendance evidence, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because he is engaging, helpful, and improves their writing despite demanding effort.

, while online reviews are positive overall but include sharper complaints about conduct.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

He is often called a tough grader, but , and make the grading feel fair.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and rewrites, while but helpful.

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Students report , and participation, so the workload is meaningful but manageable.

Format shift

and reading, while online reviews mention papers and a final.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe him as funny, passionate, helpful, and unusually effective at teaching writing.

Format shift

In-person reviews are highly enthusiastic, while online reviews are mixed because some students dislike his sarcasm and remarks.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and participation, with some quizzes and finals mentioned.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers, while and secondary.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive and , and tough but useful grading.

Main concern

Students must show up, read, participate, and accept blunt humor.

What students said

“Not an easy A, must work hard for your grade”
ENG102
“He is definitely a but he gives .”
ENG101
“Show up to class, put in work and participate.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are more polarized, with strong praise for feedback and motivation but serious complaints about sarcasm and classroom conduct.

Main concern

Some online students found his jokes, sarcasm, or public critique uncomfortable.

What students said

“ easy”
ENGL101
“He offers & re-writes.”
ENG102
“ .”
ENG102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course is mostly paper-driven, with some quizzes and finals, and reviews do .

Final ExamTake-Home QuizIn-Class QuizEssaysRewrites

Assessment risk

Standard

63/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and in-class quizzes, papers, and finals, but do not clearly prove open-book or .

Take-Home QuizIn-Class QuizFinalPapers
“There was 1 take home and 1 in class quiz, 3 papers and 1 final.”
ENG102
“There are 3 papers , 2 at home quizzes and 1 final .”
ENG102

Online

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Easy FinalNo Tests Except Final
“ easy”
ENGL101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy A, must work hard for your grade”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Professor Covell is the most amazing teacher at Avc.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ !!”

⚖️

58/100

“He is definitely a but he gives .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes the class super fun and he's hilarious!
  • so everyone understands.
  • He is funny but not for everyone so if .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy A, must work hard for your grade
  • He offers & re-writes.
  • You have to work to gain a good grade.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • He cares about each one of his students
  • , and helps shape you into a better writer/analyzer.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

176

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years with rich detail and a consistent pattern of .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5139
4 out of 518
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG10214 reviews
ENG10110 reviews
ENG0997 reviews
ENG1011022 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
Show 15 more courses
316271 review
362321 review
ENG1 review
ENG0951 review
ENG097ENG0991 review
ENG099ENG1021 review
ENG2221 review
ENG2791 review
ENG991 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGL2461 review
ENGL2651 review
ENGL2791 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 5

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1