AI Rate Professor

English

Kathryn Mitchell

ENGL101 · ENG257 · ENGLIENGL · ENG99 · EN99 · ENG102 · ENG103 · ENGLISH101 · ENG099 · ENGL242250 · ENGL10202 · ENG250 · ENGL103 · ENG101 · LDR200 · ENGL250 · ENGL099 · ENG256 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
88.24%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want real writing growth and can handle heavy work, but be cautious with online sections.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCaring But DemandingLots of HomeworkTough GraderStrong FeedbackPolarizing Online
  • Students often praise her care, passion, and ability to help writers improve.
  • The class is work-heavy, with , and participation expectations.
  • Online reviews are much more polarized, with several severe complaints about clarity, tone, and workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say students must keep up with , and participation.

Online reviews include both easy A outcomes and harsh complaints, while as earned through effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course material is not impossible, but , and writing expectations make it academically demanding.

and workload-sensitive, while in-person sections sound demanding but better supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory or say participation and showing up are necessary to pass.

Online attendance evidence is mixed, while and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her for care and learning value, but online complaints and .

, while online reviews are strongly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students often describe her as a and analysis, even when they respect her teaching.

Format shift

Both formats mention tough grading, with online reviews .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and writing assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews especially complain about workload surprises, while but meaningful.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

She is often praised as caring, helpful, and passionate, but severe online complaints lower the overall score.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is stronger and warmer, while online evidence is polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment is mainly papers, essays, quizzes, discussions, workshops, presentations, and reading responses.

Format shift

Both online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more positive , and serious writing expectations.

Main concern

, and strict grading can overwhelm students seeking an easy class.

What students said

“Not an easy class, but she teaches very well.”
ENG103
“Lots of reading, but you learn how to analyze what you read.”
ENG257
“Very helpful teacher.”
ENG99

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising fast replies and while and too much work.

Main concern

Online workload and .

What students said

“Do the assignments and you'll pass.”
ENG103
“ .”
ENG102
“A doable A but you have to work for it.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, midterms, finals, and tests, but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring rules.

QuizzesMidtermFinalBig TestsEssay-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and analysis-based tests, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book policy.

MidtermFinalQuizzesAnalysis Tests
“2 essays, midterm, final, weekly discussions, response writings, tons of reading and quizzes.”
ENG102
“ .”
ENG257
“A and MLA.”
ENGL099

Online

, and assigned reading, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Weekly QuizzesBig TestsReading-Based Quizzes
“occasional weekly essays/quizes, 2 big papers and 2 big tests.”
ENG103
“Gives a few quizzes but its based on the so if you read its easy.”
ENG102
“ and .”
ENG103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not an easy class, but she teaches very well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Amazing teacher. I learned a lot in her class, but you have to be willing to do the work.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“So many papers and a .”

⚠️ Online Risk

50/100

“UNCLEAR AND HORRIBLE.. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is the .
  • She teaches something not many professors do; she teaches you how to think.
  • She is a teacher who teaches you not only know about how to improve Writing skill,but also how to treat others respectively.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A doable A but you have to work for it.
  • She makes you work for your grade.
  • I worked very hard to get a A so it can be done if you work at it.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • and she does not follow her syllabus.
  • because of the amount of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is strong because 50 reviews include both online and in-person experiences with , and support.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 59
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG10210 reviews
ENG1038 reviews
ENG2576 reviews
ENG1015 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
Show 14 more courses
ENG2562 reviews
ENG992 reviews
ENGL0992 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
0991 review
EN991 review
ENG0991 review
ENG2501 review
ENGL102021 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGL2422501 review
ENGL2501 review
ENGLIENGL1 review
LDR2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 2 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1