AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nashat Saleh

MTH65 · CHEM110 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

He looks worthwhile for MTH65 students who want a manageable class, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy to PassTest FocusedLenient AttendanceFunny LecturesMixed Teaching Quality
  • Most MTH65 reviews describe an easy, likable, and pass-focused class.
  • One CHEM110 review is sharply negative and reports serious teaching and .
  • Tests matter, but calculators and focused review make the math course feel manageable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

MTH65 looks easy to pass with and focused test prep, though CHEM110 does not look easy or fair.

All evidence comes from in person reviews; there is no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

MTH65 students repeatedly say the class is easy or focused only on what is needed to pass, but CHEM110 is described as difficult.

All evidence comes from in person reviews, with MTH65 much easier than CHEM110.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, but comments say he is often lenient unless absences become excessive.

; online review count is zero.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

because MTH65 is manageable and , and focused on test material.

All recommendation evidence comes from in person reviews, with one strong negative CHEM110 outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

MTH65 comments describe , and focused exam prep.

Format shift

, but CHEM110 reports grading mistakes.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

MTH65 has homework practice and four tests, while CHEM110 is tagged with lots of homework and test heavy.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in person reviews, and it varies strongly by course.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

MTH65 reviews praise his lectures and kindness, but the CHEM110 review says he could not teach the material.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in person reviews, with strong course-level disagreement.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests, finals, and test-focused preparation, while .

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from in person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews are mostly positive for MTH65, but one CHEM110 review is very negative about teaching and .

Main concern

Course experience appears to depend heavily on the class, with CHEM110 much worse than MTH65.

What students said

“his class is quite easy to pass even without showing up”
MTH65
“this professor is amazing!”
MTH65
“Cannot teach whatsoever and either googles the answer or needs a .”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

MTH65 exam evidence is student-friendly because calculators were allowed and he reviewed only what students needed for tests and the final.

Calculator AllowedFinal Allows CalculatorFocused Test ReviewFour Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person MTH65 reviews say calculators were allowed on tests and the final, while reviews .

Calculator AllowedFinal Allows CalculatorFocused Test ReviewFour Tests
“ .”
MTH65
“he allowed us and .”
MTH65
“He will go over ONLY what is going to be on the test and final”
MTH65

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He will go over ONLY what is going to be on the test and to pass this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course-specific risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“i was blown away by how much of the course subject i retained during his lectures.”

📈 Easy A Signal

78/100

“his class is quite easy to pass even without showing up”

🧪

80/100

“he allowed us and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and willing to answer any question you have.
  • this professor is amazing!
  • Cannot teach whatsoever and either googles the answer or needs a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • his class is quite easy to pass even without showing up
  • but its good practice for tests.
  • He will go over ONLY what is going to be on the test and final

Theme 3

🧪

  • .
  • he allowed us and .
  • most of the time hes very lenient about it!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

, and the evidence is split between very positive MTH65 reviews and one severe CHEM110 warning.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MTH654 reviews
CHEM1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values