AI Rate Professor

History

Rich Sims

ART131 · CERAMICS · ART101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if the specific course has a strong recent reputation, because the Ceramics reviews are a serious warning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityUnfair Ceramics GradingHelpful AssistantsProject-Based ArtBeginner Friction
  • Student experience changes sharply by course, with ART reviews much stronger than Ceramics reviews.
  • Ceramics students describe harsh expectations, weak support, and .
  • The positive , and a lighter path to completion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

ART101 looks easy if you complete the project, but Ceramics students report unfair grading and one C- even after complaining.

and Ceramics much harder.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content ranges from simple project work in ART to beginner Ceramics that students say expects too much.

Only in-person reviews exist, and course difficulty varies heavily by class.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, though ART101 says students can sometimes skip.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on course choice because positive ART reviews are offset by very negative Ceramics experiences.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the tone differs sharply by course.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Ceramics reviews specifically say grading is unfair, while ART101 appears graded by only a few things.

Format shift

, and Ceramics is the main concern.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

ART101 can be light after the project, but Ceramics students describe a rule-heavy and demanding class.

Format shift

Only in-person workload evidence exists, with workload varying by course.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

and comfort, but Ceramics comments describe poor help and low patience.

Format shift

Only in-person teaching evidence exists, and course-specific contrast is strong.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and few graded items more than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and it is highly mixed across ART and Ceramics.

Main concern

Ceramics students , and .

What students said

“ and Teachers Aids.”
CERAMICS
“Too much for beginners.”
CERAMICS
“if be taken off”
ART101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, with ART101 and project while other courses do not clearly prove exam policy.

Project-Based AssessmentField Trips Instead Of MidtermReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Standard Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention a possible ART101 midterm alternative through field trips but do .

Field Trips Instead Of MidtermProject-Based Assessment
“two and project.”
ART101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Too much for beginners.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and workload themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ and Teachers Aids.”

⚖️

30/100

“ .”

📌 Course Variability

48/100

“This class is great the and and how to do it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and Teachers Aids.
  • Old and has no patience
  • Everyone is responsible to work no excuses.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Too much for beginners.
  • .
  • if be taken off

Theme 3

🧩 About Course Structure

  • class based .
  • Be prepared to clean a lot!!
  • two and project.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, and the course experiences conflict strongly.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CERAMICS2 reviews
ART1011 review
ART1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values