AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Athanasia Cholvin

MATH13002 · MATH070 · MATH135 · MATH130 · MATH125 · MATH120 · MATH102 · MATHMATH · MATH115 · MATH250 · MATH160 · MATH50 · 105 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are already strong in math, attend consistently, and can study independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing teacherStrict attendanceHard testsSelf-study riskMath-strong students only
  • Reviews are sharply split between and students who say they had to teach themselves.
  • Tests, finals, scantrons, and .
  • All analyzed evidence is in person, despite one in-person-labeled comment saying a class was online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students say an A is easy if you study packets and attend, but , and poor grade recovery.

All authoritative counts place the evidence in person, with zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content ranges from easy for prepared students to very hard for weaker students, especially in calculus and algebra courses.

, so format differences cannot be confirmed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is often mandatory or functionally required, with comments saying you can be dropped or fail if .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendations depend heavily on student fit because confident math students may do well while others report confusion and self-teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students repeatedly mention no curve, , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Workload varies, but many reviews mention lots of , and heavy studying.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely in-person.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching reviews are polarized, with strong praise for clarity offset by many complaints about confusion, disorganization, and weak help.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and projects, with exams carrying major weight.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed and polarized, with praise for clarity from some students and , and help from others.

Main concern

Many students report , and a .

What students said

“The calculus itself was not difficult, having to memorize dozens of complicated formulas for ”
MATH250
“I basically taught myself in this course.”
MATH102
“ . Clear and understandable lectures, makes the hard stuff easy to understand.”
MATH250

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because many comments cite hard finals, scantron tests, inconsistent tests, and .

Scantron TestsHard FinalNo Partial Credit MentionedFrequent TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly mention difficult tests, scantrons, finals, and inconsistent partial credit, but .

Scantron TestsHard FinalFrequent TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“1 test graded w/partial credit & 20 questions & the next graded w/ NO partial credit and 4 questions.”
MATH250
“Everything is on scantron.”
MATH160
“Because !”
MATH160

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I basically taught myself in this course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She was not the her lectures, and expects for other to understand.”

⚖️

28/100

“If you are borderline, expect not to be raised.”

🧪

30/100

“Because !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Clear and understandable lectures, makes the hard stuff easy to understand.
  • I basically taught myself in this course.
  • Be prepared to teach yourself!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy to get an A.
  • There is .
  • Never gotten a C before now.
  • If you know everything in the packet your golden.

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • Everything is on scantron.
  • but the .
  • She has a !
  • The tests are worth 80% and are from similar problems in the packet.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

105

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews across many courses with rich, repeated themes, though the comments are old and highly polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 519
3 out of 513
2 out of 512
1 out of 524

Course coverage

MATH12514 reviews
MATH16012 reviews
MATH1307 reviews
MATH2504 reviews
MATH1023 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1152 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATHMATH2 reviews
MATH0701 review
MATH130021 review
MATH1351 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 3

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values