AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Emmanuel Wreh

MATH070 · STAT115 · MATH70 · MATH101 · STATS · MATHSPRI · MATHS70 · MATH115 · STATS115 · STATISTICS · MATH102 · MATH050 · 63 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Emmanuel Wreh only if , and some self-teaching in exchange for .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityStrong AccentFast PacedLenient CurveOpen Book Exams
  • Student opinion is sharply split between inspiring, helpful teaching and .
  • Grades can be forgiving through curves, retakes, , or take-home tests, but .
  • Students who can self-study and keep up with pace are more likely to benefit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Grades can be forgiving because of curves, , retakes, and , but students still need to keep up and some report harsh inconsistency.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Some classes feel easy, but statistics and summer courses are often described as fast-paced or .

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format difference can be measured.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but students warn that missing class makes it easy to fall behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend him when they value leniency and help, but , and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Curves, , retakes, and , but several reviews call it inconsistent.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Workload is often manageable with , but , and fast pacing create effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching reviews are split between very helpful and inspiring versus rushed, unclear, impatient, or hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

Assessment includes tests, midterms, finals, homework systems, reviews, and rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly mixed, praising his help and leniency while criticizing accent, pace, and .

Main concern

Many students say he is hard to understand, moves too fast, or grades inconsistently.

What students said

“I usually have to find myself reteaching myself some of the stuff”
MATH102
“He is a :)”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam style is generally student-friendly when open-book, take-home, curves, or , but some students report rushed or inconsistent testing.

Open Book TestsTake-Home TestsCurvesExtra CreditRetakes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open-book or , and some concerns about grading errors.

Open Book TestsTake-Home TestsCurvesExtra CreditGrading Errors
“All the and open note”
MATH70
“Tests are open book or .”
MATH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you stay in the class and do the work, you almost can't fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He really works with you and understand.”

⚖️

70/100

“ and offer .”

⚠️ Main Risk

45/100

“He goes through the material very fast and expects you to know everything after he goes through it once.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made me to understand and love statistics.
  • I did not grasp anything from class and worked solely from Educosoft.
  • He is a great teacher. I would .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • and offer .
  • .
  • Does not want to fail anyone.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Pace And Clarity

  • Very hard to understand his accent.
  • Material is being covered way too fast to comprehend.
  • You have to listen carefully because he has a thick accent.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

63

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 in-person reviews over many years with detailed and repeated themes, though the opinions are polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 55
3 out of 511
2 out of 510
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH11520 reviews
MATH1027 reviews
MATH705 reviews
STATISTICS5 reviews
MATH0502 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MATH0702 reviews
STAT1152 reviews
STATS1152 reviews
00071 review
MATH1011 review
MATHS701 review
MATHSPRI1 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1