AI Rate Professor

English

Cheryl Elsmore

ENGLI101 · ENGLISH99 · ENGL101 · ENGL102 · ENGLISH101 · ENG103 · ENG102 · ENGLISH · ENG097 · ENGL103 · ENG101 · ENG97 · ENG095 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her only if and will use revisions, , and help early.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHarsh essay gradingExtra credit and rewritesMixed teaching clarityReading quizzesBetter for motivated writers
  • some students love her help and energy, while .
  • complaints about grammar-focused and .
  • , rewrites, and easy quizzes can make the grade recoverable for students who do the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A is possible through rewrites and , but easy A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The reading and quizzes are manageable, but essays and grammar expectations make the course uneven.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews mention quizzes at the beginning of class but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they suggest class presence matters for quizzes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

She is recommended by students who want feedback and extra chances, but .

Recommendation and is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

She offers rewrites and , but as harsh and grammar-heavy.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Students report , and some unnecessary assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Some students find her helpful and engaging, while .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

The course , and finals rather than one dominant method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with praise for kindness and support but and .

Main concern

and instruction can feel unclear to some students.

What students said

“She .”
ENGL101
“ and gives .”
ENG101
“She changes her mind on a daily basis about what's expected of you and your assignments.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show standard quizzes, tests, midterms, and but no clear proctoring evidence.

Reading quizzesTestsMidterms and finalsTake-home final evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention frequent reading quizzes, tests, midterms, finals, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Reading QuizzesTestsMidterms and FinalsTake-Home Final
“ on them.”
ENG101
“the midterms and ”
ENG101
“There were two tests, two papers, , and a .”
ENG102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent instructor! Definitely not easy, she'll make you earn your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📝

35/100

“She .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“She is a nice and helpful person.”

📈 Grade Path

60/100

“ and gives .”

⚠️ Clarity Risk

40/100

“ but if asked.”

Theme 1

📝

  • !!!
  • .
  • though .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was an amazing teacher.
  • She is not a and doesn't really teach what needs to be taught.
  • and engaging!

Theme 3

📚

  • You will write three or four essays.
  • every class is a .
  • There were two tests, two papers, , and a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

30

Recent reviews read by the AI

30

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 30 reviews across many years with detailed and recurring themes, though opinions are inconsistent.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 58
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1017 reviews
ENGL1015 reviews
ENG1024 reviews
ENG1033 reviews
ENGL1023 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ENG0951 review
ENG0971 review
ENG971 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGLI1011 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLISH991 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values