AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dilip Purohit

MATH70 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn the material independently and do .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing TeachingLow RecommendationHigh FrustrationPoor Software Handling
  • The only review says .
  • The course was rated difficult, with no evidence of .
  • There is no online evidence, and the and negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

There is no grade evidence, and the course was rated difficult with a strongly negative learning experience.

The evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material felt harder because the teaching .

The evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

The evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only student explicitly .

The evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Reviews do not provide clear proof of .

Format shift

The evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not describe workload enough to judge it clearly.

Format shift

The evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

The only review says his teaching was not helpful and made the class more confusing.

Format shift

The evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

The evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only in-person review and poor class support.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“ and I would leave class more confused than before.”
MATH70
“I did not enjoy his class and .”
MATH70

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, book policy, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and I would leave class more confused than before.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“ and I would leave class more confused than before.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“I did not enjoy his class and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and I would leave class more confused than before.
  • He did not even understand how to work educosoft.

Theme 2

🚫 About Recommendation

  • I did not enjoy his class and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the pattern is weak despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values