AI Rate Professor

English

Melanie Jeffrey

ENGL101 · ENGL102 · ENG102 · ENG097 · ENGENGL · ENG101 · ENG099 · ENG095 · ENGC70 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you want a demanding writing class and , but if GPA protection is your main goal.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderCritical Thinking HeavyHelpful But PolarizingWriting IntensiveSometimes Unorganized
  • Student opinion is sharply split between excellent, engaging teaching and serious complaints about organization and fairness.
  • The course often requires many essays, critical thinking, and sustained writing effort.
  • Getting an A is risky because many students describe strict, subjective, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some strong writers report doing well, but , and difficult for earning an A.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The content is not advanced, but critical thinking, essays, and .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but comments suggest class participation and showing up matter for points and learning.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and discussion, but many others strongly warn against her because of grading and organization.

and highly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many reviews directly call her a hard, critical, or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students frequently , and heavy writing demands.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

Many students praise her energy and help, but repeated complaints about disorganization and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and writing assignments, with some exams mentioned.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe writing-heavy assessment.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a polarizing teacher who can be inspiring and helpful, but , and hard to earn high grades from.

Main concern

Many students , and heavy writing.

What students said

“Melanie grades extremely hard.”
ENGL101
“ and unprofessional.”
ENG102
“Awesome instructor! the subject, very good instruction!”
ENGL102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, a midterm, a final, and in-class essays, but .

MidtermFinalMLA TestIn-Class EssaysNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and in-class essays, but the exact exam rules are not clearly proven.

MidtermFinalMLA TestIn-Class Essays
“1 MLA test, 2 Essays,Final, Midterm, and 1 Research project.”
ENG101
“Total 5 essays, 2 of those are in class. 1 MLA Exam.”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are a and you will definitely learn a lot. If you aren't a strong writer, consider a teacher who passes people just to pass them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Awesome instructor! the subject, very good instruction!”

⚖️

28/100

“Melanie grades extremely hard.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“This teacher at Cccs is very confusing, she does a 6 page essay every 2 weeks”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is always on time, and she utilizes Facebook for .
  • She is a great teacher, and she actually cares about her students.
  • . Shows favoritism. Rude and unprofessional.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Good Teacher. Grades hard. Wants you to think!
  • Grades extremely hard.
  • It's impossible to meet HER standards and earn better than a C.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Assignments

  • 3 essays, MLA test, and 1 Long term project.
  • Total 5 essays, 2 of those are in class. 1 MLA Exam.
  • at the end of the semester u r going to write a 8 page paper.

Theme 4

👍 About Recommendation

  • .
  • ! She is excellent!
  • I suggest you wait next semester for another teacher, don't bother.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 43 reviews across several years with detailed, recurring themes, though opinions are highly divided.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG10117 reviews
ENGL1018 reviews
ENG1027 reviews
ENG0995 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG0951 review
ENG0971 review
ENGC701 review
ENGENGL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values