AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Laolu Laditan

MATH070 · MATH60TH · MATH50 · MATH100 · MATH70 · MATH · MATH115 · MATH102 · MATH60 · MATH050 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him only if you can learn independently and are .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandSkips stepsFunny personalityHelpful if askedUneven teaching
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, but many students say his accent, board writing, and skipped steps make learning hard.
  • Positive reviews describe him as funny, nice, and willing to help when asked.
  • Several negative reviews say the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Some students found lower-level courses easy, but and skipped steps made success require self-teaching.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content may be basic, but the course often feels harder because .

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format difference can be measured.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention leaving early, canceled classes, and absences, but do not clearly prove a .

and is not consistent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is weak because many students say he is hard to understand, skips steps, or does not teach clearly enough.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews , so the score stays neutral despite mixed difficulty ratings.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

One review reports a lot of homework and several tests, while other reviews focus more on clarity than workload.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

He is often described as nice and funny, but repeated complaints about accent, board writing, skipped steps, and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and computer-assisted work, suggesting a mixed assessment structure.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

humor and kindness offset by repeated complaints about clarity, skipped steps, and inconsistent help.

Main concern

Students may struggle if they need detailed, step-by-step math instruction.

What students said

“Hard to understand when he speaks. Can barely see his writing on the board.”
MATH60
“he skipped steps and didn't really teach in detail.”
MATH100
“Overall, he was fun and .”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove exam .

Tests mentionedQuizzes mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests but do not clearly prove exam format or rules.

Tests mentionedQuizzes mentioned
“i hardly ever stayed the whole class and :)”
MATH50
“quizzed when majority of classes aksed for review.”
MATH70
“He does give out a lot of homework, and ”
MATH102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Very very funny! But...it is VERY difficult to understand his accent!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in clarity, personality, workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“he skipped steps and didn't really teach in detail.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“ .....”

📈 Course Challenge

45/100

“This guy makes easy problems hard, and hard problems imposible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to understand when he speaks. Can barely see his writing on the board.
  • When solving problems, he skips steps he thinks you already know but will go over it again if you ask.
  • His teaching is almost non-existant, the course was horrible.

Theme 2

🙂 About Personality

  • , but strong accent
  • he is okay, sumtimes talks off topic, but makes the time go by fast.
  • He made math fun, but he expected a lot in return.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty And Work

  • You're at a disadvantage if you don't do your work and he says so in no uncertain terms.
  • He does give out a lot of homework, and
  • seeing as it is computer assisted, class is so ****ing easy. lol

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one reviews across several years give many detailed and consistent themes, though all reviews are old and grade data is missing.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH605 reviews
MATH504 reviews
MATH2 reviews
MATH0502 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH702 reviews
MATH0701 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1151 review
MATH60TH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values