AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lynda Little

MATH70 · TRIG · MATH060 · MATH135 · MATH102 · MATH60 · MATH50 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a patient math teacher and are willing to keep up with and practice.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsHelpful with questionsBeginner friendly mathLenient test policiesComputer homework
  • Most students describe her as , and easy to understand.
  • Grades look manageable when students keep up with , and lab work.
  • A few students disliked her teaching method or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A looks realistic if students complete homework, quizzes, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math content is , though some tests and lab pacing still challenge students.

Only in-person reviews exist, so no format difference can be judged.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but and missed days seem manageable in some classes.

, and there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Most students recommend her because and helps students who ask questions.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Make-up tests, dropping the lowest test score, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

68/100

Students , and Educosoft, but not an overwhelming load.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and good at explaining math to struggling students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and tests rather than one single method.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

for clear explanations and help with math.

Main concern

Some students found .

What students said

“the way that ”
MATH102
“ .”
MATH135
“Often she has us work in the yet explained”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, midterms, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Make-Up TestsDrops Lowest Test ScoreMidterms And Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a and dropped-test policies making exams less risky.

Make-Up TestsDrops Lowest Test ScoreMidterms And Final Mentioned
“ . .”
MATH135
“you'll pass even if you don't do so well on the midterms and final”
MATH102
“the ; no tricks”
MATH135

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Path

78/100

“If you do good on the homework and quizes on line you'll pass even if you don't do so well on the midterms and final.”

⚖️ Test Fairness

82/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She answers questions and makes sure everybody understands.
  • and explains Trig in a way that is easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Very Eazy, I Just Breezed Through The Class.
  • A little tough but .
  • The but I managed the course pretty.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • she makes it harder than it really needs to be
  • I think she was hard and she didn't care for the students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 17 reviews with consistent themes, but they are old and often lack grade or policy details.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH605 reviews
MATH1023 reviews
MATH1353 reviews
MATH703 reviews
MATH0601 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH501 review
TRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values