AI Rate Professor

English

Bobbie Harris

ENGLI101 · ENG102 · ENGLISH101 · ENGL103 · ENGLISH102 · ENG101 · ENG099 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take her only if you can handle loose structure, lots of writing, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy but inconsistentHeavy writingUnclear gradingFun discussionsOften unprepared
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who loved her and students who felt they learned little.
  • The class can be easy, but writing volume and .
  • Several students mention .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many students call the class easy and describe forgiving grading, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online reviews analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The course content sounds accessible, but the amount of writing and .

Only in-person reviews exist, so .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Reviews do , but they do mention professor absences and workshop flexibility.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether a student values an .

The mixed recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Several comments describe redos, excused work, and easy A outcomes, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The class is often called easy, but , and reading.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Positive comments praise fun classes, but many negative comments say she did not teach clearly or .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and in-class essays more than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but inconsistent English class with both strong praise and serious complaints.

Main concern

, and weak organization.

What students said

“There was a lot of writing though, and I mean a lot.”
ENG101
“Very unprepared.”
ENG102
“Its when you come in for 5 and then you can redo it for an A.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention in-class essays, a , and some tests, but .

In-Class EssaysPortfolio FinalTests MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence points more to writing-based assessment than traditional exams, with .

In-Class EssaysPortfolio FinalTests Mentioned
“We had 4 draft assignments, two in-class essays and one novel (The Kite Runner) to read.”
ENG101
“The she calls a portfolio.”
ENG101
“ .”
ENG102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class, but this teacher just bugs me.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“I enrolled in the professor's class to be taught, that never really happened.”

📈 Easy A Signal

80/100

“Its when you come in for 5 and then you can redo it for an A.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

35/100

“Very unprepared.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really made the class fun.
  • Really didn't get taught in this class

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • There was a lot of writing though, and I mean a lot.
  • I pulled off an A in her class and that was missing an in class assignment
  • only 2 major papers

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • This teacher does not stick to her schedule very well.
  • Poorly prepared and .
  • I do not understand how she grades.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

There are 27 reviews across several years, but many are old, polarized, and missing grade details.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG10112 reviews
ENG1028 reviews
ENG0992 reviews
1011 review
ENGL1031 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGLI1011 review
ENGLISH1011 review
ENGLISH1021 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values