AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jupei Hsiao

CRN76498 · STAT130 · MATH73 · MATH073 · MATH62 · MATH70 · MATH180 · MATH190 · MATH130 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
71.74%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Strong pick for stats if you will keep up with notes and homework; think twice for harder math if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear stats lecturesLots of homeworkExtra credit availablePolarizing personalityNotes-and-practice driven
  • Recent MATH/STAT 130 students often call her caring, structured, and doable with steady work.
  • Older precalc and some , and disorganized lectures.
  • , but notes, late passes, and help dedicated students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A , and study; stats is more forgiving than precalc.

Online reviews more often say easy if you complete work; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

, but precalc and accelerated terms remain intellectually demanding.

Online summer stats is rushed; in-person difficulty varies sharply by course number.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

as unlikely to pass, even when some hybrid videos exist.

Online attendance is looser, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and recent stats praise are solid, but a sizable minority strongly advise avoiding her.

Online and recent MATH130 lean positive; older in-person MATH180 reviews pull the recommendation down.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some students get late passes and , while others call her picky and a .

Format shift

Online feedback is gentler; .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Frequent homework, notes, quizzes, and content is clear.

Format shift

Both formats stress lots of homework; summer hybrids intensify it.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and care, but others report mistakes, sarcasm, or .

Format shift

Recent in-person and online stats teaching rates higher than older precalc reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, lecture notes, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online leans on notes and ; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she can be excellent and supportive for engaged students, but others find her picky, sarcastic, or .

Main concern

and interpersonal friction surface more in in-person higher-level math.

What students said

“professor Hsiang is amazing!! so thorough and easy to understand but you must attend class to pass!”
MATH130
“ thing”
MATH130
“She is a .”
MATH180

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are structured with , and test reviews; self-pacing works if you stay on top of work.

Main concern

Fast online pacing and long and overwhelming.

What students said

“I basically felt like it was self taught bc she gives you three-eight 30 min videos A WEEK”
STAT130
“Great teacher! I had her during the pandemic, and the class was pretty easy in my opinion.”
MATH130
“you will have to work.”
MATH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and reviews; friendliness varies by term with occasional notes or cheat sheets.

Test reviewsNotes allowed on some testsCheat sheet sometimesPop quizzesHomework-like exams

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cheat sheet, but and tough partial-credit grading appear often.

Notes on tests sometimesCheat sheet sometimesPop quizzesTough partial credit
“you can use your notes for every test”
MATH130
“She also has a 1 sheet of ”
MATH130
“ .”
MATH180

Online

Online exams are often similar to homework and paired with test reviews; .

Test review before examsHomework-similar tests
“a will be on the exam”
STAT130
“The .”
MATH130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A if you put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, separating recent stats praise from older precalc criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ so thorough and easy to understand but you must attend class to pass!”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“Lots of .”

⚠️

48/100

“She is a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I literally love her, was the .
  • Her video lectures were easy to understand
  • lectures seem to be a scattered and disorganized

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you put in the work.
  • Good solid professor, but definitely not a pushover.
  • you will have to work.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and understanding
  • and forgiving
  • can be very condescending

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across stats and precalc with mixed but patterned opinions give strong, course-dependent signal.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH13017 reviews
MATH18014 reviews
MATH1906 reviews
MATH704 reviews
STAT1304 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH0732 reviews
CRN764981 review
MATH621 review
MATH731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 5 · A 16 · A- 2

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 7

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

4

D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1