AI Rate Professor

English amp Literature

Levon Parseghian

ENG201 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and heavy writing; avoid if you need quiet, tightly structured lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDiscussion-heavyEssay intensiveMandatory attendanceClear criteria (mixed)Participation required
  • Strong for students who enjoy deep discussion and heavy writing in literature/composition.
  • No traditional tests in some sections; .
  • three enthusiastic reviews and one sharp critique of rambling and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students can earn A or A- and participating, but as strict and earned.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and required discussion make the course intellectually and time intensive.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Three of four would take him again for thought-provoking discussion despite one strongly negative review.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and deserved grades; one tags him as a .

Format shift

In-person only; opinions conflict.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of reading, many papers, and short-term courses can feel overwhelming.

Format shift

In-person only; all workload comments refer to essays and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Praised for humor and deep discussion by most, criticized as rambling and condescending by one.

Format shift

In-person only; split opinions lower consistency.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

No tests in some sections; , and participation.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and , but workload and personality fit matter a lot.

Main concern

, and polarizing lecture style.

What students said

“THE actually for LIT 144.”
ENG201
“You have no tests just 3 essays and a final. The a lot of writing and research”
ENG201
“The man makes no sense and rambles on about Justin Turner's "beautiful face" continuously”
ENG201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper-based with .

No traditional tests3 essays plus finalParticipation requiredWriting intensive

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report no tests, only sequenced essays and a .

No tests3 essaysFinal paperDiscussion participation
“You have no tests just 3 essays and a final.”
ENG201
“must participate and attend all classes. He gives you the grade you deserve.”
ENG201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and helped me see things on a deeper level. I would genuinely look forward to going to class because I didn't fear being wrong with my answers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with mixed sentiment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“You definitely learn a lot from his lectures.”

📝 Writing Load

28/100

“it was very hard to write that but I still finished the class with an A.”

🗣️ Discussion Culture

85/100

“ if you don't like to discuss out loud”

⚠️ Polarizing Style

30/100

“He also talks down to students”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he has great humor.
  • he would build off of whatever we said.
  • LECTURE HEAVY

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you do your work, you'll be fine.
  • He gives you the grade you deserve.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • Get ready to read
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with conflicting tone and older 2018 outliers make conclusions provisional.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG2014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1