AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Tiesha Stewart

Courses not reported · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
8.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if ; only self-directed students who can reverse-engineer vague prompts should risk enrolling.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasUnclear AssignmentsHeavy HomeworkTough GraderPoor Support
  • Students repeatedly cite vague instructions, late or locked materials, and .
  • Workload is described as excessive for Child Development courses, often stacked with reading and multi-day assignments.
  • rude or dismissive emails and skipped office .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

on guessing expectations and grinding through heavy assignments.

Online reviews stress unclear standards; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content difficulty is less the , and multi-hour assignments.

Both formats describe confusion; online adds lockouts and textbook-only delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Some sections mark attendance mandatory, others optional or not stated, with online often asynchronous but still picky about participation.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Only about 8% would take again; and cite stress and poor support.

Online majority is strongly negative; in-person sample is small but also critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and opaque point deductions .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Lots of , and full-day tasks overwhelm students taking other classes.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students say she , and responds rudely when asked for help.

Format shift

Online voices dominate teaching critiques; in person she is called funny but still inefficient.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades hinge on frequent projects and homework; .

Format shift

Online reviews detail assignment weight and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and Canvas confusion, though one student notes she can be funny in class.

Main concern

Changing deadlines without notice and .

What students said

“she's not very efficient with telling you when deadlines are and until after.”
211
“ and confusing.”
211

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online Child Development sections are framed as , and unsupported, with locked modules and little teaching beyond the textbook.

Main concern

and missing instructor presence make asynchronous work feel like a puzzle.

What students said

“ and ask questions because you don't understand something she simply just says read the first module”
211
“She gives excessive amounts of HW and .”
211
“it is all just straight from the textbook. I felt she was a .”
114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Workload is assignment-first; at least one course offers a .

Assignment HeavyOptional PowerPoint FinalProctored Exam Option

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; stress is on vague assignments and shifting deadlines.

Vague Assignment InstructionsShifting Deadlines
“ and confusing.”
211

Online

Online students mention a final choice between creating a PowerPoint or taking a .

PowerPoint Final OptionProctored Exam OptionHeavy Assignments
“For the final exam, there are 2 options: Create a PowerPoint presentation or taking the .”
232
“She has two choices for the .”
114

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She gives excessive amounts of HW and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (10 online, 2 in person), highlighting clarity, workload, and support themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

12/100

“ ! I took her for CD111 Curriculum and it was awful.”

📂 Disorganization

20/100

“Her class is anything but organized.”

📚 Overwhelm Workload

16/100

“So much work you .”

💬 Poor Support

18/100

“Her responses to my emails were rude, dismissive, and unhelpful.”

Theme 1

🧩 About Assignments

  • Assignments and .
  • It feels like a puzzle to complete them.
  • her

Theme 2

💻 About Online Delivery

  • she locks everything, do not work with her.
  • It seems like she doesn't even .
  • she does not teach at all, it is all just straight from the textbook.

Theme 3

❤️ Rare Positive Notes

  • I found this class to be amazing because all the
  • and wants her students to understand the material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve recent reviews are detailed and thematically consistent, but the small sample and one glowing outlier keep confidence at medium.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 57

Course coverage

1146 reviews
2114 reviews
2322 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1