AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jordan Vincent

CHEM120 · CHEM130 · CHEM110LAB · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Worth it for general chem if , and use the notecard and drop policy; less ideal if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDrops lowest examNotecard on testsTough but structured chemAttendance points matterSlow email replies
  • , and practice exams.
  • Chemistry remains hard with lecture-heavy pace and .
  • , and email responsiveness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, and curves help, but and heavy chem content still demand serious study for an A.

; the single online review did not report an easy path.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

General chemistry is inherently hard here with dense lectures, reading, and .

Both formats call chem hard; and test difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and Kahoots even when not every review labels it mandatory.

; the online review also marks attendance as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

A majority would take him again for structure and teaching, while a and poor communication.

In-person recommendations dominate; the only .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

, and notecards soften tough exams, but several students still call him a tough or .

Format shift

; online evidence is thin.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly online HW, lecture-heavy sessions, labs, and endless busywork.

Format shift

Online was described as ; and reading.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and prep materials, while others report rushed chapters, messy writing, and weak outside support.

Format shift

; the online review found lectures dry and unengaging.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

with online HW and labs secondary; lowest exam often dropped.

Format shift

In-person and online both emphasize tests; online also mentioned a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chem is demanding but many call him the , and notecards.

Main concern

and communication outside class is uneven.

What students said

“ ”
CHEM110LAB
“his tests are difficult. The problems on the is covered in class”
CHEM110LAB
“Easily the ”
CHEM110LAB

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online chem review , and limited office-hour windows.

Main concern

Low interaction and delayed help made an already hard course harder.

What students said

“He didn't try to make lecture fun, no interaction with students, and ”
CHEM120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are demanding but student-friendly policies like dropped scores and notecards often offset the difficulty.

Drop lowest examNotecard often allowedPractice exams before testsTough multi-step problems

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notecard is often allowed and the lowest of three midterms is dropped.

3 midterms drop lowestNotecard front and backPractice examsCumulative final
“Best 2 of 3 exams, cumulative final, notecard allowed”
CHEM110LAB
“he lets you use one 3 x 5 inch notecard, front and and ”
CHEM130
“The problems on the is covered in class”
CHEM110LAB

Online

One online review notes few tests plus a .

Few testsGroup project finalHomework heavy
“A , and "”
CHEM120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's a heavy course, but . Best 2 of 3 exams, cumulative final, notecard allowed, online HW, no lab exams. He curves & truly sets you up to succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 chemistry reviews emphasizing exam policies, difficulty, and mixed support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Easily the . 3 mid terms (he drops the lowest grade) &1 final exam, 2-3 practice exams .”

📝

58/100

“he lets you use one 3 x 5 inch notecard, front and and .”

⚠️ Communication Gaps

35/100

“Dr. .”

👍 Recommendation

64/100

“If you work hard you will pass”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • way that's easier
  • spends a good amount of time on each topic
  • Teaches about 25% of the material during lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • , so study

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • Does not answer emails
  • Not easy to get in touch w/ out of class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews from 2020 to 2026 give solid recent detail but show a and frustrated students.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM110LAB10 reviews
CHEM1303 reviews
CHEM1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2