AI Rate Professor

English Literature

Chris Andrews

ENG31530 · ENGL201 · ENG201 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Strong pick for ENG101/201 if you write the essays and participate; just know recent communication may lag.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious lecturerEssay redo allowedCaring feedbackLight homeworkParticipation helps
  • Students love his humor, energy, and
  • readings, labs, discussions, and a few papers
  • One recent ENG201 review flags poor email response and late-work friction

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Essay rewrites, light homework, and if you .

Online highlights redo chances; effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

, but essays and discussions still require steady work.

Both formats describe manageable difficulty with reading and a few papers.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

yet students say showing up mainly helps participation and keeps you current.

Online and in-person both mix mandatory flags with comments that if you keep up.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Nearly all students call him a recent communication complaint.

Online reviews are uniformly glowing; in-person is glowing except one 2024 ENG201 critique.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Allows essay redos and higher end-of-semester resubmits while .

Format shift

Redo policy appears in both online and older in-person comments.

Workload

Light

78/100

, and a handful of essays.

Format shift

Workload is light in both formats.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Hilarious, caring, and engaging with , though a recent review notes declining responsiveness.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong online and in person; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation more than sit-down exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and discussions over traditional tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and A-friendly with feedback, though one 2024 review says he became hard to reach.

Main concern

A 2024 student says email and end-of-term submission issues worsened.

What students said

“Easy going, funny just read and turn the assignments in and he that A is guaranteed.”
ENG101
“ and always seems to have issues with accepting work”
ENG201
“Great teacher, easy A only if you .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise kindness, , and engaging class energy.

Main concern

Missing redo opportunities can cost a full letter grade.

What students said

“I unfortunately and did not attempt to redo them. If so I would've receive an A.”
ENG101
“as long as you do the essays and participate do the work youre most likely to pass”
ENG201
“ . He is such a character and he's hilarious!”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays with rewrite chances rather than strict proctored exams.

Essay focusedEssay redo allowedLab questionsFew other assignments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment is essays, peer review out loud, reading, and .

Essay rewritePeer review out loudLight homework
“allows you to turn your essays again at the end of the semester for a higher grade”
ENGL101
“ . All you have to do is just read simple small and interesting articles”
ENG101

Online

Online students stress essays, lab build-ups, and redo opportunities without describing proctored finals.

Essay redoLab questionsFew papers
“I unfortunately and did not attempt to redo them”
ENG101
“ and a few papers”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy going, funny just read and turn the assignments in and he that A is guaranteed. A model for other professors to be like.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting humor, essay support, and one recent outreach concern. Credibility rating: High.

😂 Hilarious Energy

92/100

“He was hilarious in class, engaging, encouraging, and truly cares about his students.”

📝

82/100

“Great teacher, easy A only if you . and allows you to turn your essays again”

⚠️ Recent Communication Dip

40/100

“ and always seems to have issues with accepting work, especially at the end of the year.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

90/100

“I waited a whole year was waitlisted twice just to be in his English 201 class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hes genuinely funny and makes sure you understand the work
  • he is funny and makes everyone feel comfortable sharing they're opinion
  • Overall Great professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The course was not too difficult
  • Just do the assignments and the lab and you'll pass
  • Do good on the essays and you'll do great

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very nice and
  • cares about his students
  • truly cares about his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

14 consistent reviews from 2015-2024 with rich detail and only one major negative outlier support high credibility.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1016 reviews
ENG2014 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
ENG315301 review
ENGL2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values