AI Rate Professor

History

Citlalli Anahuac

SP24143 · WH170 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
98.04%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

Must-take history professor if you will show up, participate, and keep up with the reading.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational and caring mentorAmazing interactive lecturesParticipation-heavy cultureExtra credit and extensionsGet ready to read
  • Nearly universal praise for , and student support across online and in-person sections.
  • Content is readable history with , and rather than harsh exams.
  • Attendance and participation matter, but the environment is welcoming and low-pressure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

, and manageable quizzes make an A realistic if you participate and complete work.

Both formats report easy work and ; online adds free materials while in .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

History content is engaging and not concept-heavy, but expect and participation tasks.

Online and otherwise accessible material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Most reviews say attendance is mandatory and .

A few online and in-person reviews list attendance as optional, but the .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Nearly all students would take her again and repeatedly call her the .

Praise is equally strong online and in person with almost no dissent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

, and strong A-rate support lenient, student-friendly grading.

Format shift

and .

Workload

Light

68/100

Reading and short reflections or quizzes are steady but rarely described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Some online students mention higher word counts; in and group work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students consistently praise , and a safe discussion culture.

Format shift

Online and quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Grades blend participation, quizzes, short writing, group projects, and .

Format shift

In person often uses group finals; online leans toward reflections and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

at Rio Hondo for engaging lectures, inclusive discussions, group finals, and genuine care.

Main concern

Attendance and participation weigh heavily; shy non-participants may struggle.

What students said

“Group quizzes done in class are very easy. answers to a prompt.”
WH170
“Professor is caring and helpful. The . no essays.”
WH170
“She also stays 30 mins after every meeting to answer any questions you may have.”
SP24143

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students praise , and free or provided materials while stressing participation.

Main concern

Participation is graded and you can be marked absent or if you stay silent.

What students said

“Even though it was an online class it was very interactive, many of us would react with emojis!!”
SP24143
“A physical textbook is not needed, she provided us with one so if you are looking to save money while taking a course, this would be the .”
SP24143
“ and quizzes which are nothing too challenging.”
SP24143

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments emphasize participation, easy group quizzes, and .

Group project finalIn-class group quizzesShort writing promptsMidterm and final reportedNo proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

finals, and limited or no heavy essay exams.

Group project finalGroup quizzesOnly midterm and finalNo essays
“The . no essays.”
WH170
“Only gives out a midterm and final. .”
WH170

Online

Online evidence focuses on reflections, quizzes, and participation with no mention of webcam or Lockdown Browser.

Reflections and quizzesParticipation gradedClear grading criteria
“ and quizzes which are nothing too challenging.”
SP24143
“Were given plenty of time to complete the homework and but the .”
SP24143

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Anahuac is simply amazing, she is very outgoing and provides good feed back. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and and consistency.

🌟 Teaching Excellence

97/100

“She is the so far. She goes the extra mile to make sure your questions are answered.”

❤️ Student Care

95/100

“1 day I missed class and she reached out to me. Because I needed to hear from somebody and she made all the difference in the world.”

📈 Easy Path to Success

84/100

“This professor is very easy going and gives a lot of options to pass with an A.”

🗣️ Participation Culture

70/100

“Participation is key so if you're shy about participation, you don't like using the chat room,then,perhaps this is not the course for you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her energy is amazing! so kind hearted and supportive, inspiring!
  • lectures are so interesting, fun and she makes sure everyone gets to express your own opinions
  • She also plays music at the beginning of her lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of , but her work is very easy.
  • There's even some opportunities which is fantastic.
  • pretty easy to pass just don't and readings

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares very much about students both personal and school life and can be very accommodating
  • she is
  • There are not many other professors this easygoing and empathetic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent detailed reviews with near-total consistency on teaching quality, care, and participation expectations.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 549
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SP2414327 reviews
WH17021 reviews
701091 review
776891 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

49 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 7 · A 16 · A- 2

B range

10

B+ 7 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 8 · Rather not say 1