AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Zelida Trang

PSCY101 · PSY112 · PSY114 · PSY101 · PSY70261 · PSYCH101 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will read constantly, sit through lecture-heavy sessions, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing LecturerTough GraderTest Heavy 100QLecture HeavyCaring But Uneven
  • Student opinions split hard between caring mentor and .
  • In-person sections often hinge , and intense multiple-choice tests.
  • Some newer comments describe easier assignment-based flow, but older criticism of exams and access remains loud.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Tough grader tags, hard 100-question tests, and statements that almost nobody gets an A outweigh a few easy-A comments.

Some Online and one recent In person review call it easy; most In person evidence stresses hard As.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard psych with and lecture pace; difficulty ratings cluster mid-to-high.

Online difficulty comments skew easier; In person reviews more often call lectures long and material test-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Several sections require attendance for lectures that preview tests, while .

In person comments more often stress not missing lecture; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; fans cite caring and learning, critics cite access and harsh tests.

Online and In person both show split .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Tough grader appears repeatedly; but .

Format shift

Harsh grading language is stronger In person; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

the load solid but not always overwhelming.

Format shift

Online can mean 5-7 Sunday due dates; In person emphasizes reading and long tests.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Praise for passion and care competes with complaints about and unreachable email.

Format shift

In person shows both hilarious-caring highs and ; Online notes engagement gaps.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and test-heavy tags dominate over sparse writing tasks.

Format shift

In ; some Online sections lean more on quizzes and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In and funny, but , and communication hard.

Main concern

100-question exams, cumulative finals, and and .

What students said

“Very easy class. 1 assignment/quizzes every week sometimes 2 assignments. Doesn't try to make it difficult.”
PSCY101
“It was impossible to get in touch with her thru emails or canvas.”
PSY101
“First day of class she told everyone how she can assure us no one would get an A in her class.”
PSY70261
“ and very intense. .”
PSCY101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences and discussions to poor engagement and .

Main concern

Late or incorrect modules and weak online engagement frustrate students who need help.

What students said

“She often posted modules late or with incorrect material.”
PSY114
“10 week class with at least 5 to 7 assignments due each Sunday. Manageable and interesting to do.”
PSY112
“Doesn't engage with online students much, which is particularly annoying when we were struggling to understand certain concepts.”
PSY101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes multiple-choice exams and .

100 Question TestsCumulative FinalTest HeavyCurved MC Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person students describe intense 100-question tests, cumulative finals, and .

100Q ExamsCumulative FinalLecture Previews TestsCurved Tests
“ and very intense. .”
PSCY101
“also 3 MC and one article summary very easy”
PSY101
“ .”
PSY70261

Online

One Online review reports mid-term content not yet assigned and ; proctoring not clearly described.

Midterm Content MismatchTough Discussion GradingTest Heavy
“Chapters appeared on mid-term that weren't assigned until after the test.”
PSY101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . It was impossible to get in touch with her thru emails or canvas.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (3 Online, 10 In person), , and access issues. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“She treats you like an actual college student. Shes a tough teacher so if psychology isnt if it is your major I do.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

48/100

“Don't understand why she has so many bad reviews shes perfect and if there is .”

⚖️

32/100

“First day of class she told everyone how she can assure us no one would get an A in her class.”

📝

34/100

“ and very intense. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures are all over the place
  • she talks non stop but she will stop if you ask her questions
  • She cares about students a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very easy class. 1 assignment/quizzes every week sometimes 2 assignments.
  • .
  • read the book and go to her lectures and you'll pass.

Theme 3

📞 About Access & Support

  • It was impossible to get in touch with her thru emails or canvas.
  • Doesn't engage with online students much
  • if there is any technical difficulties

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews spanning 2016-2025 with detailed, conflicting but and teaching evidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSY1016 reviews
PSCY1012 reviews
PSYCH1012 reviews
PSY1121 review
PSY1141 review
Show 1 more courses
PSY702611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1