AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Farrah Nakatani

ENGT101 · ENGT150 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want strong CAD/engineering teaching and are ready to work for a fair grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackParticipation mattersProfessional expectationsCaring and accessibleYou earn your grade
  • Consistently praised as knowledgeable, charismatic, and one of the .
  • Workload and , and participation.
  • Attendance and professional behavior are expected in both formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students earn A/A+/B+ through reading, projects, participation, and .

Online and in-person both stress challenge and critique; no free-A narrative.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Difficulty ratings and comments about reading, CAD projects, and high expectations make content non-trivial.

Both formats describe challenge; online adds honest critique of work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and say participation matters.

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

100% would-take-again energy and .

Recommendation is strong across online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

; but grades are earned, not given.

Format shift

; online still describes honest critique.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and participation expectations.

Format shift

Homework/reading load is clearest in in-person ENGT150 comments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students , and among their best teachers.

Format shift

Strong praise in both formats, slightly more detail in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation more than classic pure exams.

Format shift

Project and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students repeatedly call her one of the and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

and if you coast.

What students said

“One of the .”
ENGT150
“You earn your grade with her. If you show up, do the work and participate you should do fine.”
ENGT101
“Lectures help but she mainly wants you to read the book so your grade may be dependent on how much you read.”
ENGT150

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online ENGT150 review still calls her a good, honest, challenging teacher who rewards professionalism.

Main concern

She will critique hard and expects respect and attention even online.

What students said

“She wants you to succeed and will challenge you .”
ENGT150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects, reading, and ; exam policy is not clearly detailed.

Project-based workParticipation gradedTextbook-dependent

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and earned grades rather than specific exam software.

Drawing projectsLots of homework
“ if you need it.”
ENGT101

Online

Online review focuses on critique and .

Honest critiqueProfessional expectations
“She knows her stuff and is not afraid to be honest and fairly critique your work.”
ENGT150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in person), highlighting teaching quality and earned-grade themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“One of the .”

📝

90/100

“She gives lots of feed back. .”

💪 Effort Required

42/100

“You earn your grade with her. If you show up, do the work and participate you should do fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Charismatic and knowledgeable teacher
  • Amazing lectures
  • Kool laid back instructor with a lot of experience in CAD

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • your grade may be dependent on how much you read

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • always willing to listen when you need to express your work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed, consistent reviews from 2016-2025 with and tags support high confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGT1504 reviews
ENGT1013 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values