AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Sondra Moe

CD102 · CD226 · CD111 · CD106 · CDCD · CD224 · CD115 · CD228 · CD106208 · CD101 · CD208 · CHILDDEV115 · CHDV210 · CD229 · CD232 · CD103 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
15.79%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Avoid unless required; if you can follow picky rubrics, never miss class, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLots of homeworkLecture heavyUnclear directionsStrict attendance
  • , and lectures that mainly read slides.
  • and mandatory attendance.
  • Older reviews are warmer, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A is possible with and meticulous assignments, but picky deductions and few graded items make grades fragile.

; and zeros.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Material itself is not advanced, but volume, detail demands, and .

In person and online both describe doable content with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Repeated notes of , and fail risk if .

Strict seat-time rules dominate in person; online still tracks weekly completion tightly.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Would-take-again is very low; students cite rudeness, boredom, and .

Newer online and ; some older in-person praise remains.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Tough grader tags and sentences are common.

Format shift

Harsh tone appears in both formats.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and weekly modules.

Format shift

Online modules front-load work; in .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

; fewer recent praise for feedback.

Format shift

; online suffers from messy modules.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and tests with study guides in some courses.

Format shift

Online leans modules, quizzes, and reading; in and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person ; some older students found fair tests and easy As with perfect attendance.

Main concern

and harsh picky grading.

What students said

“Her lectures are full of and not adding anything to the material. It's a waste of 2 hours”
CD228
“This professor is deplorable! Attending her in person is pointless.”
CD106
“Lectures is her reading each powerpoint sentence by sentence, word by word.”
CD224

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections criticized for , and poor communication under stress.

Main concern

and unforgiving late-work or zero policies.

What students said

“She will give you zeros out of her own anger. . 0/10.”
CD102
“ , and .”
CD226
“the way the need to do on the assignments.”
CD106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often manageable with study guides, but and .

Study guidesQuizzes and testsHomework-test mismatchAttendance-tied grade

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In ; some let students peek at tests or notes briefly before starting.

Study guideReview sheet before testLook at test before takingFew high-stakes items
“She also lets u take a look at the and allows u to look for the answers before taking it.”
CHILDDEV115
“ and study sheet is provided.”
CD106
“She'll let you have the test and look at your notes for about 5 minutes before you take it.”
CD103

Online

Online reviews mention tests and modules but ; difficulty is clarity and toughness, not camera rules.

Module quizzes and testsTough graderReading heavy
“She thinks she is asking heady critical thinking type questions when they are actually complicated and nonsensical.”
CD226
“If you miss assignments or do badly on the .”
CD106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Taking her in person may be worse than online. Her lectures are full of and not adding anything to the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting tough grading, workload, and lecture complaints. Credibility rating: High.

👎 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“Horrible!!!!! If I could rate her a 0 I would.”

📝

28/100

“Multiple points were taken off for missing 1-2 sentences for .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“Assignments took 2-3 hours to do for .”

🏫 Lecture Value

30/100

“You know how they teach you in elementary not to read off of presentations, she be doing that and THATS the lecture.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's super boring
  • she will never let her classes out early

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She can be very critical and
  • I felt like my best was never enough in her class
  • Overall easy class with

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • she answers your question with a question and confuses you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews over many years with detailed recent complaints that , and lecture style.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 57
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CD10610 reviews
CD2266 reviews
CD2285 reviews
CD2084 reviews
CD1022 reviews
Show 11 more courses
CD1112 reviews
CD2242 reviews
CD2292 reviews
CHILDDEV1152 reviews
CD1011 review
CD1031 review
CD1062081 review
CD1151 review
CD2321 review
CDCD1 review
CHDV2101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1