AI Rate Professor

Design

Maurice Herman

ARCH235 · ARCH215 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take as many classes with him as you can if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringGood feedbackChill studioFair graderAccessible
  • All three reviews give perfect quality scores and .
  • , and strong mentoring.
  • He meets students one-on-one and has written recommendation letters that helped transfers and scholarships.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

All reported grades were A or A+ with and ample project time.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Studio difficulty is moderate but and plenty of time.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory, though the overall vibe is chill rather than punitive.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and as many of his classes as possible.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Described as a and A+ outcomes across all reviews.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Light

78/100

; no reports of .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

, and career support including recommendation letters.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Studio projects and participation dominate; exams are not described.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person architecture studio students describe him as , and invested in their long-term success.

Main concern

Small sample size; .

What students said

“ . Highly recommend taking as many classes possible with him!”
ARCH235
“Gave class plenty of time with assignments and was a .”
ARCH235
“Chill Professor. . Has some pretty good lectures and as clear as possible.”
ARCH215

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on studio projects and .

Project-basedFair gradingParticipationStudio assignments

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe project-based studio work with and .

Studio projectsFair graderParticipation matters
“ .”
ARCH235
“Gave class plenty of time with assignments and was a .”
ARCH235

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as many classes possible with him!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, , and strong mentorship. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ as clear as possible.”

💯 Recommendation

98/100

“Any class with Prof Herman is good.”

❤️ Mentorship

92/100

“Gave me a lot of advice which helped me get into Cal Poly Pomona and wrote me letters of recommendation for scholarships.”

⚖️

90/100

“was a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Super chill
  • pretty good lectures

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • meets with everyone twice a semester to see how you're doing

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • plenty of time with assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only three highly positive in-person reviews with strong internal consistency, but small sample and limited time diversity lower certainty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCH2352 reviews
ARCH2151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values