AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Aileen Acosta-Mata

ENG030 · ENGLI101 · ENG035 · ENGLISH35 · ENG201 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG3114 · ENG35 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you want writing feedback and can keep up with heavy papers and ; skip if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGives good feedbackLots of papersMandatory attendanceCaring but unevenSlow grading
  • , and caring support for writing.
  • Workload is paper-heavy with frequent reading and group work, and .
  • and missing class or conferences hurts your grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Rewrites and conferences help, but many papers, reading, and .

Almost all grade-effort evidence is in person; the one online review called the class easy if you do the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is standard college English with and , but volume and pace can feel high.

; online sample is too small to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that skipping or missing conferences hurts your grade.

; one older in-person review said it was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and writing growth, despite loud complaints about workload and grading speed.

Recommendation tone is mixed in person; the sole online review was positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Some get rewrite chances and rainchecks; , and long delays.

Format shift

Leniency claims .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly cite many papers, journals, reading, and group work that stack up quickly.

Format shift

; online mentions less volume detail.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Praised as , but others call her confusing, late, or unhelpful.

Format shift

; online evidence is a single positive note.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and lab conferences more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

and ; online adds little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person, students split between caring mentor with and frustrated reports of , and uneven communication.

Main concern

Lots of papers and delayed grades; some say handwriting and .

What students said

“ . You will work in groups. Gives you a if you want to improve your grade.”
ENG101
“You won't get your grades from assignments about 3 to 4 weeks after you turn them in.”
ENG101
“If you do all your assignments from the beginning, you will be fine in her class.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single older online review describes her as nice but sometimes strict, with easy work if you participate and stay on top of reading.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online experience is poorly documented.

What students said

“The class is easy as long as you do your work and pay attention.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are mainly in-class essays and reading checks; reviews do not describe lockdown or webcam proctoring.

In-class midterm essayIn-class final essayReading quizzesBook-based tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final essays plus quizzes tied to required reading.

In-class essay midtermIn-class essay finalReading quizzes
“you HAVE TO read the book/ stories for the midterm and final.”
ENG101
“1 in and a .”
ENG101

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do all your assignments from the beginning, you will be fine in her class. is not difficult and she gives you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

📝

72/100

“ and is willing to answer your questions. .”

📚

32/100

“assigned 40 or so assignments and would only grade 10”

👍 Split Recommendations

66/100

“The !!!”

⏱️ Slow or

40/100

“You won't get your grades from assignments about 3 to 4 weeks after you turn them in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and gives .
  • Shes really great at explaining, taking notes and paying attention HELPS ALOT.
  • falls off topic constantly. and orderly fashion.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gives you a if you want to improve your grade.
  • AWFUL, HORRIBLE GRADER, 3 JOURNALS A WEEK!
  • Go to class, write your essays and you will not have a problem.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cares about her students.
  • She is mean teacher and
  • Answers your questions and a student.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

25 reviews spanning many years with , and attendance comments support a stable mixed picture.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG10112 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
ENG0352 reviews
ENG352 reviews
ENGLI1012 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG0301 review
ENG2011 review
ENG31141 review
ENGLISH351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Pass 1