AI Rate Professor

English Literature

Samuel Isaac

ENG101 · ENGL201 · ENG201 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you already write well and ; otherwise switch sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardSo Many PapersPolarizing TeachingTough On Weak WritersClear Criteria When ClearMandatory Attendance
  • and group projects.
  • Strong writers can earn solid grades; weaker writers often feel stuck.
  • Students split hard between inspirational mentor and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Confident writers can earn an A with steady paper work and office help, but weaker writers often land B/C grades despite effort.

Online praise is mild; most grade .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Course content centers on lots of , and group work.

and papers; difficulty ratings cluster around medium-high in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and one tag warns that skipping means you will not pass.

as mandatory in both the single online review and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and feedback, while if writing is not already strong.

The lone online review is strongly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Clear criteria help some students, but and B/C outcomes show little free cushion.

Format shift

Leniency claims are sparse online; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated tags and comments about so many papers, group projects, and .

Format shift

detail from in-person courses.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students call him inspirational and smart, while others say lectures contradict and teaching feels useless.

Format shift

Online tone is warm; in-person quality ranges from 5-star praise to 1-star disasters.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades revolve around research papers, presentations, group projects, and in-class essays more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy pattern appears in both formats, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some praise smarter writing and , and confusing.

Main concern

and harsh outcomes for weaker writers.

What students said

“He is really smart and knows his stuff. He really made me think and write better.”
ENG201
“ .”
ENGL201
“You got too really work for your grade!”
ENG201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One positive online ENGL201 review calls him nice, thoughtful, and manageable if you follow instructions.

Main concern

Only one online review, so the online experience is thinly documented.

What students said

“If you listen to what he says, you will have no problems. I really liked him.”
ENGL201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and presentations far more than formal exams, so .

Many PapersGroup ProjectsIn-Class EssayParticipation Matters

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

presentations, and at least one in-class essay.

Research PapersGroup PresentationsIn-Class Essay
“It's basically 5 research papers (5-7 pages) & 4 presentations with your group and one in class essay.”
ENG201

Online

Online comments do not clearly describe proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Participation MattersReading Heavy
“The , but it was a really good class overall.”
ENGL201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are confident about writing then this class can be an easy A, but if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews spanning online and and polarized outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Paper Overload

28/100

“It's basically 5 research papers (5-7 pages) & 4 presentations with your group and one in class essay.”

✍️ Growth For Strong Writers

70/100

“He really made me think and write better. i look back on that class bc it taught me alot.”

⚠️ Polarized Outcomes

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is really smart and knows his stuff.
  • He has no idea what he's doing. Makes no sense.
  • He is a cool guy and makes you think.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall not that difficult to get an A if you do the work and talk to him.
  • You got too really work for your grade!
  • If you are confident about writing then this class can be an easy A

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • Get ready to read
  • GROUP PROJECTS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven mixed reviews from 2016-2022 give usable detail, but the small sample and polarized tone limit confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG2013 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
ENGL2012 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values