AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Phildon Huffaker

PHIL124 · PHIL101 · PHIL120 · PHILOSOPHY101 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want inspiring philosophy lectures and are , and study hard for a fair A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesPassionateNote-heavyClear gradingStudy for the A
  • Students love his lectures and say he can make them fall in love with philosophy.
  • , and studying specific in-class arguments.
  • Online sections add camera-on participation; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic if , and learn his arguments, but it is not a free pass.

Online and in-person both reward effort and notes; online adds camera participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy concepts and thorough testing keep the .

Difficulty ratings and comments are similar across formats, with a bit more structure online.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

34/100

and you will not pass, and online needs cameras for points.

Online is explicit about cameras for participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Nearly all reviews recommend him for philosophy.

Strong recommendation holds online and in person, with only one older negative outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

and fairness if you seek help, though .

Format shift

; in-person mostly calls him fair.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload centers on heavy notes, some reading, and .

Format shift

Both formats stress notes; books are often optional if you listen carefully.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Amazing lectures, patience, humor, and passion dominate student feedback.

Format shift

Excellent teaching is reported online and in person, aside from one old negative review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Blue-book tests, essays, and graded participation matter more than many small assignments.

Format shift

Online emphasizes participation and ; and notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and passion, with notes and reading as the path to exams and essays.

Main concern

Blue-book style thorough answers and heavy note dependence punish slacking.

What students said

“I was absolutely fascinated and even contemplated changing my major to philosophy.”
PHIL120
“tests are all blue book written so always be prepared as .”
PHIL101
“be ready to write ALOT of notes. It is the ONLY way you will pass .”
PHILOSOPHY101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and inspiring, with participation mattering and cameras needed for points.

Main concern

Cameras must be on for participation and note-taking is essential because content is mostly verbal.

What students said

“Cameras must be ”
PHIL101
“His lectures are simple to understand and if you do not .”
PHIL101
“ because he says things verbally there's not really any visual stuff he hands out.”
PHIL124

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and notes; online adds camera participation rather than proven lockdown software.

Blue book written examsNote-based testsCamera-on participationEssay heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays are based on detailed class notes and .

Blue book written examsNote-based tests
“tests are all blue book written so always be prepared as .”
PHIL101
“the tests and notes”
PHIL101

Online

Online evidence highlights camera-on participation and verbal .

Camera-on participationVerbal lecture notes
“Cameras must be ”
PHIL101
“ because he says things verbally”
PHIL124

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class made me love Philosophy.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews (3 online, 13 in person), highlighting lectures, notes, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎓 Lecture Quality

91/100

“His lectures are simple to understand and if you do not .”

📝 Path to Success

58/100

“STUDY and you'll def get an A”

❤️ Passion for Philosophy

92/100

“I was absolutely fascinated and even contemplated changing my major to philosophy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • he will repeat it as many times as you want
  • Very interesting lectures!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • be ready to write ALOT of notes
  • STUDY and you'll def get an A

Theme 3

😄 About Personality

  • He is the sweetest person ever and really funny too!
  • he's very funny
  • Phildon is a very nice teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning 2012-2022 are detailed and highly consistent about lecture quality and note-based success.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL10110 reviews
PHILOSOPHY1013 reviews
PHIL1202 reviews
PHIL1241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Fail 1