AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Razvan Stoian

VN061 · ADN252 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Consider him for ADN clinical-style classes if you want a relatable instructor, but treat the harsh nursing skills complaint as a serious risk flag.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilariousApproachablePolarizingRead for examsClinical strength mixed
  • Two ADN252 reviews call him chill, funny, sincere, and .
  • One VN061 review strongly warns he is unprepared, falls asleep, and teaches skills poorly.
  • Experience seems course-dependent, so verify the exact section before enrolling.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Two students earned As by reading and engaging, but the negative review implies high pressure on skills check-offs.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty sits mid-to-high with required reading and program-level nursing expectations.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

At least two reviews list mandatory attendance, typical for nursing courses.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two glowing recommendations are offset by one absolute do-not-recommend review about poor preparation.

All recommendation evidence is in person and course-split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Successful students say reading leads to good exam scores, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Get-ready-to-read tags and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong praise for humor and approachability collides with a severe unpreparedness complaint.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence; ADN and VN experiences diverge.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Exams, reading, group projects, and skills check-offs all appear in comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

ADN252 students love his humor and honesty, while one VN061 student says he is unfit and unprepared.

Main concern

Inconsistent preparation and skill teaching quality across courses.

What students said

“Stoian is awesome! He is relatable and very approachable.”
ADN252
“Read and you .”
ADN252
“MR. Stoian is so unfit for the nursing program, he will be falling sleep in class and not be prepared to teach”
VN061

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students say , while skills check-offs can be demanding; .

Read for examsSkills check-offs

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and skills check-offs with high expectations.

Read for examsSkills check-offs
“Read and you .”
ADN252
“he will expect you to know everything on check offs.”
VN061

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting split ADN versus VN experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

😄 Personality Praise

80/100

“Stoian is super chill, he's funny, he is relatable, and sincere.”

⚠️ Polarizing Quality

55/100

“ .”

📖

60/100

“Read and you .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Clinical Support

  • He is an even better clinical instructor, I would love to have him again.
  • wants you to succeed

Theme 2

⚠️ About Preparation Concerns

  • he will be falling sleep in class and not be prepared to teach
  • Skills he wound teach you the correct way, but he will expect you to know everything on check offs.

Theme 3

😄 About Personality

  • He is relatable and very approachable.
  • hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2021-2022 with sharply opposing views make the overall picture unstable.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ADN2522 reviews
VN0611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values