AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Leah Griffith

MATH170 · MATH30 · MATH070 · MATH180 · MATH190 · MATH140 · ENG35 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and tough-test load.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWorksheet not lectureSelf-teach heavyLoads of homeworkHard testsNice but poor teaching
  • Many students say she rarely lectures and expects self-teaching from worksheets and the book.
  • and and hard.
  • A minority say doing all work plus can still yield a pass or A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and homework completion help some, but and tough grading keep an A far from free.

Online reviews are harsher on grade payoff; a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Coursework, reading, and as heavy and .

High difficulty appears in both online and in-person comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags say skip class and you will not pass.

and also appears online.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

About two in , but most detailed comments urge finding another math professor.

Both online reviews are no; in-person opinions are mixed but lean negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags dominate, though and exists.

Format shift

Online students stress tough grading; .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report weekly floods of textbook, online, and and PODs.

Format shift

Overload is the strongest shared theme online and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Frequent complaints of no real lessons, vague answers, and few fans.

Format shift

Online quality is all 1s; in-person averages low with some 4-5 outliers.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and occasional group work.

Format shift

and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

most call her a poor teacher who hands out worksheets and piles on homework, while a few praise feedback and .

Main concern

, and tests that do not match classwork.

What students said

“Never taught an actual lesson. gives out worksheets and walks around the class to "help you"”
MATH190
“By far the . She gives out loads of useless work, about 6-18 assignments every single week”
MATH140
“Yes, there is a lot of but as long as you submit them she will give you full credit so do not stress too much.”
MATH140

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH140 reviews are strongly negative , and little grading leniency.

Main concern

and little meaningful .

What students said

“Many loads of homework. Yes, there is but when they are added together it only gives you less than 1%.”
MATH140
“The and hard, she expects you to write paragraphs for answers on hw.”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and poorly aligned with lectures, with surprise quizzes also reported.

Hard examsTest heavyPop quizzesLong exams

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

mismatch classwork, and may include pop quizzes.

Hard testsTest heavyPop quizzes
“ .”
MATH170
“She doe not teach , so you have to read the textbook and learn everything on your own.”
MATH170
“ taught.”
180

Online

Online students describe long hard exams open only on the due day with .

Long hard examsExams open only on due day
“The and hard, she expects you to write paragraphs for answers on hw.”
MATH140
“ it's due. Day of the final we had 11 assignments.”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be ready to teach yourself at home. I'm not sure how the other teachers are but if you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews with strong , and . Credibility rating: High.

📚

28/100

“Never taught an actual lesson. gives out worksheets and walks around the class to "help you"”

🧱

12/100

“She gives out loads of useless work, about 6-18 assignments every single week that .”

🧪

32/100

“The and hard, she expects you to write paragraphs for answers on hw.”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

38/100

“ any math courses.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never taught an actual lesson
  • Prepare to teach yourself everything
  • She complicates everything and does not allow students to find other ways

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Nearly half the people that took her class dropped it in 2 weeks
  • If you pass the to impossible

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • !!!
  • Day of the final we had 11 assignments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews over many years with repeated themes on workload, self-teaching, and and recommendation split.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH14014 reviews
MATH1804 reviews
MATH1703 reviews
MATH1903 reviews
1801 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG351 review
MATH0701 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 2 · Pass 1 · Rather not say 1