AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Amtul Chaudry

PHY212 · MATH160 · ASDFA3424 · MATH20 · MATH050 · MATH70 · MATH070 · MATH50 · MATH175 · MTHMTH7 · MATH17576565 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
9.09%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless no other math option exists and you can follow her exact methods under strict rules.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh tough graderStrict attendance policeHumiliates studentsTest-heavy nitpickingDo-it-her-way only
  • Most and .
  • and phones or early exits can cost you.
  • A if you tolerate the strict style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Students report harsh deductions for method, little partial credit, and high fail or .

Almost all grade-risk evidence is in person; the single online review does not report a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

and her-way-only rules, and difficulty ratings stay high.

In-person comments dominate; online only confirms tough delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Reviews say miss two classes and you are out, early exit can mark absence, and phone use equals absence.

Both the online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Would-take-again is near 9 percent and most comments .

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

and stories of correct answers marked wrong if not done her way dominate.

Format shift

In-person evidence is extensive; online lacks grade detail but still negative.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of as absence if missed, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Many call her a smart but rude teacher who confuses students and humiliates questions.

Format shift

One online review mirrors the belittling pattern seen in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Test-heavy tags and nitpicky exams requiring every step drive the course experience.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math students overwhelmingly report harsh grading, humiliation, rigid methods, and notes.

Main concern

Rude tone, no partial credit flexibility, and .

What students said

“ . Even if shes the only math professor available just wait until next semester”
MATH070
“She is very strict/rude and follows her syllabus religiously.”
MATH160
“Not strict like the but the strict to make learning tough and scared to ask questions.”
MATH50

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online Zoom review says she belittles students, discusses private matters in class, and lectures with a sink-or-swim style.

Main concern

Public shaming during Zoom and low support if you do not understand.

What students said

“this professor will belittle and pick on certain students... She does it during Zoom”
MATH175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and often graded for exact method and every step, with little flexibility.

Show every stepNitpicky gradingNo partial credit storiesTests from notes for some

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

way, can be very hard, and sometimes do not match lectures.

Write every stepNitpicky examsNotes-based tests for someNo late work
“ because she asks you to write out every single step.”
MATH160
“ .”
MATH160
“ .”
MATH160

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Even if shes the only math professor available just wait until next semester”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (1 online, 28 in and strict climate. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Climate

24/100

“she will make you feel unintelligent.”

⚖️

14/100

“Dissapointed to have her take points off my test results despite my answers being correct”

🚪

12/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

📝

  • marks off for any little mistake
  • If theres one mistake she wont give partial credit
  • obsessed with everyone doing this her way only

Theme 2

⏰

  • you can only miss two classes
  • marked me absent for leaving 10 minutes early
  • if u miss an as if u missed a whole class

Theme 3

😔 About Classroom Tone

  • will belittle and pick on certain students
  • put them on the spot. Very embarrassing
  • scared to ask questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews over many years are and strictness, giving strong confidence despite sparse online data.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 59
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH1607 reviews
MATH706 reviews
MATH0705 reviews
MATH0503 reviews
MATH502 reviews
Show 6 more courses
ASDFA34241 review
MATH1751 review
MATH175765651 review
MATH201 review
MTHMTH71 review
PHY2121 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3