AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ling-I Chen

CHEM140LAB · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; if you can.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisrespectfulArbitrary GradingNo Partial CreditAvoidUnclear Writing
  • Students report disrespect and unprofessional treatment early in the term.
  • and partial credit is denied.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

No partial credit and of reach.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students rate the lab as hard and the instructor adds confusion rather than clarity.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only review is an .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Quizzes are scanned not graded and partial credit is refused.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

; the main issue is unfair evaluation of work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe disrespect, illegible writing, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

and they feel arbitrary.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One early-term lab , and no partial credit.

Main concern

and poor treatment of students.

What students said

“She's arguably the . She disrespects students, doesn't actually grade your work”
CHEM140LAB
“I don't really grade your quizzes I kinda just look at them and determine.”
CHEM140LAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and opaque scoring.

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and offer no partial credit.

No Partial CreditArbitrary Quiz Scoring
“She doesn't give partial credit and her writing is horrid.”
CHEM140LAB

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and . She's so bad.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting grading and respect issues. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

5/100

“Do yourself a favor and . She's so bad.”

📝

12/100

“I don't really grade your quizzes I kinda just look at them and determine.”

😤 Teaching Quality

10/100

“She disrespects students, doesn't actually grade your work”

Theme 1

📉

  • doesn't actually grade your work
  • doesn't give partial credit
  • I kinda just look at them and determine

Theme 2

🚫 About Recommendation

  • She's so bad

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed but dated 2021 review exists, so confidence is limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM140LAB1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1