AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Dana Vazquez

ENGLISH101 · ENGLI35 · ENG0887 · LIT102 · ENG035 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGLISH · LIT147 · ENG35 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Prefer her in person if you will ; think twice about online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFood-themed essaysTough MLA graderCaring in personOnline organization issuesLots of writing
  • In-person students often love her energy, humor, and maternal .
  • Online sections draw repeated complaints , and disorganization.
  • You can earn a strong grade with disciplined MLA work, but free As and topic freedom are uncommon.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Some call it a pretty easy A if you follow directions; others say no easy A and .

Older online reviews more often say easy A; newer online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard composition difficulty, inflated by volume of food essays and MLA precision.

Online and in person share food-theme writing load; online adds navigation friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

; online still demands weekly discussion discipline.

; online is more about weekly post deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Would-take-again sits near half; raves for .

In-person leans WorthIt; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Effort and following her exact specs can earn high grades, but tough-grader and MLA docking appear often.

Format shift

Online more often ; in person more fair-but-strict.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Lots of reading, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

Both formats heavy; summer online is repeatedly called work-dense.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

In person she is praised as , and mentoring; online communication quality is uneven.

Format shift

Teaching experience .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Essays, discussion posts, and MLA correctness dominate; few comments describe traditional proctored exams.

Format shift

True for online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes are frequently called energetic, hilarious, and and food themes.

Main concern

Heavy paper load, strict MLA/works-cited focus, and .

What students said

“Treats all her students like her kids. Very energetic and .”
ENG101
“Cares more about works cited and .”
ENG101
“The best english teacher at Rio hondo college.”
ENGLISH101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and .

Main concern

, and food-topic fatigue.

What students said

“The and she didnt really communicate with me during the course.”
ENG101
“Avoid online class. unrelated or ”
ENGLISH101
“ and an .”
ENGL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay- and discussion-driven with strict format standards rather than webcam-proctored exams.

Multiple essaysMLA format focusFood-themed promptsDiscussion postsNo proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and works-cited perfection; exam logistics are not clearly detailed beyond essay assignments.

Multiple papersStrict MLAFood landscape themes
“Cares more about works cited and .”
ENG101
“ however it is manageable if you do not procrastinate.”
ENG101

Online

Online work is essays and weekly discussions; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown proctoring.

EssaysDiscussion postsFood topics
“Four essays and a couple of .”
ENGL101
“youre basically writing about food the whole time.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Treats all her students like her kids. Very energetic and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 reviews (10 online, 35 in person), contrasting in-person warmth with online organization complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🍲 Food Theme Everywhere

70/100

“ALL WE WROTE ABOUT WAS FOOD.”

💻 Online Caution

40/100

“Avoid online class. unrelated or ”

👩‍🏫 In-Person Warmth

85/100

“She is probably one of the best English teacher you could ever have!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very energetic and .
  • She is funny, always makes hilarious jokes
  • The way she conducts class is a bit scattered but she always provides clarity when needed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her class is no easy A you def have to work for it
  • if you follow her directions and do the work you will do well
  • She's a , and assigns lots of homework.

Theme 3

🖥️ About Online Experience

  • Instructions and lengthy.
  • It takes her weeks to grade an assignment
  • her online class was really easy... as long as you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

45 reviews over many years with rich detail and a and online friction.

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 54
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG10120 reviews
ENGLISH10110 reviews
ENGL1016 reviews
LIT1022 reviews
1011 review
Show 6 more courses
ENG0351 review
ENG08871 review
ENG351 review
ENGLI351 review
ENGLISH1 review
LIT1471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1