AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lynn Tran

MATH160 · MATH62 · MATH070 · MATH175 · MATH062 · PRESTATS60 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you can put in steady effort, attend every class, and seek help early; skip if you need a light or easy math course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy Homework LoadMandatory AttendanceMixed Communication ClarityExtra Credit AvailablePolarizing Teaching Style
  • Course content is challenging and often requires tutoring and .
  • and skipping is widely flagged as risky.
  • Students split sharply between and those frustrated by communication and workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible but , and heavy personal study against tough grading.

Most ; the single online review reported a C.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students repeatedly call the math hard, fast to fall behind in, and poorly suited for those already weak in math.

Difficulty complaints are concentrated in in-person reviews; the online review also rated difficulty high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as required, with repeated warnings that skipping means you will not pass.

Both the online review and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; fans value help and clarity, critics reject the workload and communication issues.

Online take-again evidence is positive but tiny; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some call grading fair with , while others tag her as a .

Format shift

Online student emphasized fair grading; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

- and test-heavy structure that eats time.

Format shift

Heavy-workload complaints .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and occasional strong lectures compete with frequent frustration over English clarity and direction.

Format shift

The lone online review is mildly positive; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests, lecture alignment with exams, and .

Format shift

Exam- and lecture-heavy .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some praise feedback, humor, and help, while , and hard-to-follow English.

Main concern

courses and sports.

What students said

“she leaves so but ridiculous amounts of homework.”
MATH070
“Challenging course, learned a lot but it took lots of my own effort in attending tutoring to learn the material.”
MATH160
“Her lectures , so there is no surprise.”
PRESTATS60

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited and willingness to help when asked, with participation mattering.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online experience remains thinly documented.

What students said

“She and will give help if asked.”
MATH175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear conventional and closely tied to lectures, with .

Lecture-aligned testsTest heavyHomework support

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students say lectures mirror tests and the course is .

Lecture-aligned testsTest heavy
“Her lectures , so there is no surprise.”
PRESTATS60
“Test heavy”
MATH070

Online

Online comments do not .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Challenging course, learned a lot but it took lots of my own effort in attending tutoring to learn the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (1 online, 7 in person), highlighting teaching polarity, workload, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Shes awesome! If you are specific when asking a question she will answer and be specific on how to do the work.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“she leaves so but ridiculous amounts of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“I do recommend her but .”

🚪

18/100

“ ! she does give !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She and will give help if asked.
  • Shes funny as well in my opinion which is a plus.
  • it can be difficult to understand her at times but she knows what she is doing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you are someone who is terrible at .
  • Challenging course, learned a lot but it took lots of my own effort in attending tutoring
  • Her lectures , so there is no surprise.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication & Fit

  • She doesnt speak English right so you will have a .
  • .
  • Outstanding teacher it can be fun at times and study and youll pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed but older reviews (2018-2020) show consistent themes with strong polarity, so confidence is moderate rather than high.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1602 reviews
MATH1752 reviews
MATH0621 review
MATH0701 review
MATH621 review
Show 1 more courses
PRESTATS601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1