AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Mark Carlock

PHY101 · PSY101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you are fine self-studying the textbook; do not expect engaging teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads PowerPointsTextbook quizzesBoring lecturesTough grader (mixed)Easy to pass if you read
  • Quizzes and
  • some call it easy to pass, others call lectures horrible and boring

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many call it easy to pass with book quizzes and , but and mixed grades keep the A from being free.

All evidence is in person; some report A or B+, others struggle with engagement.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

PSY101 content is often called easy with , though PHY felt harder for one student.

All in-person; PSY reviews say easy, one PHY review rates difficulty 4.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; others strongly advise against due to boring teaching.

All in-person; recommendation is split 50/50.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and book-based tests help some students, but .

Format shift

All in-person evidence.

Workload

Light

72/100

Frequent short quizzes from the , and some .

Format shift

All in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Repeated complaints of reading slides, boring lectures, and little real teaching of the material.

Format shift

All in-person; milder reviews still call lectures PowerPoint reading.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes every other week and .

Format shift

All in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person PSY and PHY and PowerPoint reading; teaching quality is mixed to poor.

Main concern

Boring lectures, mandatory attendance, and .

What students said

“Lectures are Read off PowerPoint. Exams and the text book.”
PSY101
“when I took one of Carlock's classes, it was horrible. He rushed through his lectures, and can be sarcastic.”
PSY101
“Does not even teach the material. like i said you will get bored to sleep if ”
PHY101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes largely reuse textbook chapter questions; .

Textbook chapter questionsBiweekly quizzesFinal from quizzesGroup project

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams pull from textbook questions; .

Textbook questionsBiweekly quizzesFinal from quizzes
“Exams and the text book.”
PSY101
“ .”
PSY101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's so boring. All you do is read out of the book and follow him on the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting boring . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Does not even teach the material. like i said you will get bored to sleep if ”

📚 Easy If You Read

70/100

“He's very easy, literally gets questions from the textbook questions.”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

42/100

“when I took one of Carlock's classes, it was horrible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are Read off PowerPoint
  • you will get bored to sleep if

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class to pass
  • literally gets questions from the textbook questions

Theme 3

📝 About Assessments

  • Exams and the text book
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews from 2016-2020 with consistent PowerPoint and textbook-test themes.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSY1013 reviews
PHY1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values