AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Ilona Missakian

ENG201H · ENGLISH101 · ENG63 · ENGL201 · ENG201 · ENGLISH201 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already write strongly and can handle a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkUnclear DirectionsSo Many PapersSkip Class You Fail
  • Recent reviews paint her as a .
  • Attendance and participation often decide your grade, and .
  • Older reviews are mixed, but post-2016 feedback is strongly negative on teaching and fairness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students repeatedly say As , and heavy papers still do not guarantee high marks.

Both the one online review and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and high expectations make the content feel demanding even for strong writers.

Online and and confusing assignment expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; .

Evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

many saying never again due to grading and unclear teaching.

Negative recommendation tone is consistent online and in person among post-2016 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students report picky rules, random zeros, and grades that ignore effort.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, daily short essays, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Heavy workload is reported in both formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

, and unhelpful explaining assignments, though a few older students found her caring.

Format shift

In-person reviews dominate; the one online review is strongly negative on teaching clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades rest on many essays, in-class writing, papers, and .

Format shift

; online also stressed lots of work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English 101/201 is paper-heavy with , and frequent complaints of ; a minority of older reviews found her helpful if you already write well.

Main concern

Harsh, inconsistent grading and .

What students said

“Im good at English but when she grades shes like a Nazi. She grades on the stupidest things.”
ENG101
“I had to make the ! The woman does not know how to run a class at all.”
ENG201
“Very hard to get an A in her class. !!! ... 18 essays per semester...~~I was in hell~~”
ENGL201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online ENG201 review calls the class extremely stressful with , and .

Main concern

and harsh grading make the online format especially frustrating.

What students said

“This was one of the . She assigns lots of work and the directions for and confusing.”
ENG201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix frequent quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Quizzes almost every classMidterm and final mentionedTest heavyPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, students report quizzes nearly every meeting, midterms and finals, and test-heavy tags alongside many papers.

Quiz every classMidterm and finalTest heavyPop quizzes
“you have a ”
ENGLISH201
“ and final. you will do a lot of writing.”
ENGL201

Online

Online review does not clearly describe exam proctoring; and .

Lots of homeworkTough grader
“She assigns lots of work and the directions for and confusing.”
ENG201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was one of the . She assigns lots of work and the directions for and confusing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews spanning 2006-2020, highlighting teaching clarity, grading, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Clarity

35/100

“ assignments and she wants you to expect to know what to do for ”

📉 Recommendation

22/100

“I had to make the ! The woman does not know how to run a class at all. Never again!”

📝

22/100

“Im good at English but when she grades shes like a Nazi. She grades on the stupidest things.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“Very hard to get an A in her class... 18 essays per semester...~~I was in hell~~”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a good teacher at all an really does not help nor work with you
  • and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • First of all, not very likely you will get an A
  • and contradicting
  • she grades really hard, and she doesnot care anything

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Be prepared for a lot of homework!!
  • Hard grader, 4
  • . You have to know how to write well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

27 reviews span 2006-2020 with detailed comments; recent reviews are consistently negative while older ones are mixed, supporting a solid but time-skewed picture.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENGL1017 reviews
ENG1016 reviews
ENG2014 reviews
ENGL2014 reviews
ENGLISH2013 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENG201H1 review
ENG631 review
ENGLISH1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2