AI Rate Professor

Fire Technology

Carlos Flores

FT044 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

outcomes look passable, but professionalism concerns from one detailed review are serious and the sample is too small to trust.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnprofessional ConductMandatory AttendanceWildland Fire FocusPolarized ReviewsRespected by Some
  • Only two reviews exist and they completely contradict each other on professionalism and respect.
  • and earned As in FT044.
  • One accuses ethics violations and humiliation; the other simply notes he teaches wildland fire and is respected.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Both reviewers earned As, but difficulty ratings are 4/5 and comments do not describe free grades.

All evidence is from in-person FT044 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty sits around 4/5 with fire-technology content; neither review calls the material easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and one tags skip class you will not pass.

Only in-person evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and tags him respected; the other would not and cites serious professionalism issues.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Both reported As despite mid-high difficulty, but there .

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

; difficulty scores suggest a moderate-to-solid load.

Format shift

In-person only; little workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

one calls him unprofessional with no empathy; the other respects him as a wildland fire instructor.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

; participation and attendance matter.

Format shift

In-person only; sparse assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person FT044 ; experiences split between deep respect and allegations of unprofessional humiliation.

Main concern

Alleged unprofessional talk about students and ethics concerns from one review.

What students said

“Very unprofessional, seen him talk bad about students to another instructor.”
FT044
“He teaches mainly wild land fire classes”
FT044

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Attendance criticalParticipation matters

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments and participation.

Mandatory attendanceParticipation matters
“He teaches mainly wild land fire classes”
FT044

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very unprofessional, seen him talk bad about students to another instructor. He should not be an instructor anywhere due to violation of his code of ethics”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Professionalism Concerns

20/100

“he has a very heightened sense of self importance and lack of empathy towards others.”

👍

70/100

“He teaches mainly wild land fire classes”

📅 Attendance

15/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

🔥 About Conduct

  • Very unprofessional, seen him talk bad about students to another instructor
  • exposing his students to embarrassment and humiliation

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • He teaches mainly wild land fire classes
  • Respected

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews years apart with opposite tones; too little consistent detail for a reliable picture.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FT0442 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values