AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Tanja Baum

ADN150 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you can self-study nursing content and tolerate harsh grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderLecture heavyCondescendingTest surprisesDiscourages questions
  • .
  • not appear.
  • Students describe condescending responses and little help when they ask questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Students report and and C- grades rather than easy As.

All evidence comes from in-person ADN150 reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and intellectually demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with participation emphasized.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every reviewer and condescending teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and and little explanatory help on graded work.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students must read the whole book and sit through lecture-heavy classes with high test stakes.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students describe , and discouragement when seeking help.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments center on hard tests and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ADN150 students report , and a defensive classroom tone with little help.

Main concern

tested, and asking for help is discouraged.

What students said

“ and offers little to no help.”
ADN150
“Says you dont need to know certain bits of .”
ADN150
“Must read the book, even if she says certain material wont be on the exam. It will magically appear on the exam.”
ADN150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as very hard and often include material students were told would not be tested.

Hard testsSurprise exam contentMust read full book

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequently include content she said would not appear.

Hard testsSurprise exam contentRead the whole book
“ .”
ADN150
“Makes you read the whole book and will have things on test when .”
ADN150

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and offers little to no help. She dislikes when students ask questions and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and low support. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Gets very defensive and condescending when you address any issues you have with her teaching style.”

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“No”

⚖️

22/100

“ . Must read the book, even if she says certain material wont be on the exam.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“Makes you read the whole book and will have things on test when .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Goes off tangent with her lectures, and discusses things you dont need to know for the test.
  • Gets very defensive and condescending when you address any issues you have with her teaching style.
  • Discouraging to ask for help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and offers little to no help.
  • .
  • It will magically appear on the exam.

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Climate

  • She dislikes when students ask questions and .
  • During lecture she speaks about her students negatively with coworker claiming some of them are unintelligent
  • Gets upset when you seek answers from other professors.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent in-person reviews from 2019-2020 show the same negative themes, but the sample is small and limited to one course.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADN1504 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values