AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Ariane Dea

ANTHROLAB101 · ANTH102 · ANTRO101L · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Avoid unless and can attend every class without needing flexibility.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAccusatory toneStrict attendanceLecture-heavy labEasy grades if presentUnprofessional communication
  • Students repeatedly call her unprofessional and accusatory, especially during pandemic online work.
  • Grades can be high if you attend, but missing class tanks the grade and makeups are hard.
  • Content is and mandatory presence make the experience poor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

All three reported grades were A-range and one student said showing up is enough, but .

Online and stronger in person.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Low-to-moderate difficulty ratings and .

Both formats describe manageable content; the pain is communication and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and comments repeatedly say skip class and you will not pass, with .

; online does not describe flexible attendance either.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Two of and comments center on accusations and unprofessionalism.

Online review is a ; in-person is split one yes and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Students report A-range outcomes and few graded items, though .

Format shift

High grades appear in both formats; .

Workload

Light

70/100

Reading and lecture answers matter, but one section is graded by few things and has only a .

Format shift

; in-person is lecture-heavy with light graded volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

, and pandemic inflexibility more than helpful teaching.

Format shift

; in-person also flags unprofessional and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

One lab is graded by few things with only a , while .

Format shift

Online emphasizes Canvas responses; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

: show up and you can earn an A, but skip and your grade drops fast.

Main concern

and unclear day-to-day expectations.

What students said

“Her grading system is very strict so if you miss just a few .”
ANTRO101L
“All you have to do is show up to class. She hates when people don't show and she will not let you make up for it without proper documentation.”
ANTHROLAB101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

of bullshitting, with zero empathy during a pandemic.

Main concern

and lack of understanding toward online students.

What students said

“Not understanding and very accusatory. Should of listened to the reviewers from UC Riverside. ”
ANTH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

a final in lab and details.

Final OnlyCanvas Lecture QuestionsAttendance Linked Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

test and heavy attendance weight rather than multi-exam rigor.

Final OnlyAttendance Critical
“The .”
ANTHROLAB101

Online

Online work involved answering Canvas questions from emailed lectures; reviews do not clearly prove webcam or lockdown proctoring.

Canvas QuestionsEmailed Lectures
“We were to answer questions on Canvas using the lectures emailed to us, then she emails us that we are trying to bull.”
ANTH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in and poor rapport. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

25/100

“ so far.”

📌

12/100

“if you miss just a few .”

🅰️ Grade vs Experience

78/100

“All you have to do is show up to class.”

Theme 1

😠 About Character and Communication

  • Not understanding and very accusatory.
  • even accused students of trying to trick her.
  • Very unprofessional.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She seems to be an .
  • Graded by few things
  • The .

Theme 3

🚪

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • She hates when people don't show
  • will not let you make up for it without proper documentation.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent reviews provide consistent negative tone and A-range grades, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ANTH1021 review
ANTHROLAB1011 review
ANTRO101L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values