AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Kelly Velasquez

POL110 · POLS000 · POLS110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Skip Velasquez if you have another POLS option; organization and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganized gradingTough graderLate grade updatesLots of homeworkPolitically biased lectures
  • Three of four students would not take her again, citing disorganization, late grades, and .
  • Workload and and unfair to many, even though .
  • and if feedback and study guides are missing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

One A+ sits against a C, a D, and comments that it is not the easy A students expected.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

content is not impossible, but assignments and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tag skip-class risk.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Only one of , and several explicitly advise not to enroll.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

, and C/D outcomes outweigh the single generous-accommodation story.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework and time-consuming work under tight deadlines dominate the comments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students cite disorganization, vague exams, bias, and inexperience .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

58/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests and midterms.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

delayed grade posts, heavy timed work, tough or vague exams, and one early drop over perceived inexperience, with a single glowing outlier about kindness and an .

Main concern

, and heavy homework under tight timelines.

What students said

“she did not update grades until the very end of the course, she does not provide a study guide for the test”
POLS110
“Did not grade anything until the week of finals so if you have any questions youre out of luck.”
POL110
“ and the .”
POLS110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; one student found the , while others got no study guide and vague questions.

QuizzesFinal ExamNo Study GuideTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final, with complaints about missing study guides and .

QuizzesFinal ExamNo Study Guide
“ and the .”
POLS110
“she does not provide a study guide for the test”
POLS110
“She isnt very specific about so be careful.”
POL110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person , and one positive outlier. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

📂 Organization Issues

25/100

“she did not update grades until the very end of the course”

📝 Workload Pressure

30/100

“she assigned heavy time consuming work and expected it to be done in an unfair time frame”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Is very politically biased with her lectures and .
  • Velasquez seems like a but is very inexperienced
  • Professor Velasquez is a very kind

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I thought this class would have been an easy A but it was not.
  • and the .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Management

  • Did not grade anything until the week of finals
  • she does not provide a study guide for the test
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

but few and somewhat mixed, limiting confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLS1102 reviews
POL1101 review
POLS0001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values