AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lynne Graham

MATH52456 · PRESTATISTIC062 · MATH62 · MATH130 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will do the homework and show up; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but unorganizedLots of homeworkTest-heavy with retakesMandatory attendanceExtra credit and redoes
  • In and offers redoes, EC, and cheat sheets that make passing realistic.
  • Online delivery was disorganized and .
  • Homework is frequent but ; as mandatory.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Retakes, , and cheat sheets make an A achievable if you do the work, even when material feels hard.

Online student dropped; Easy A evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is manageable with notes and help, though some students still find parts difficult.

Online review rated difficulty higher; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn you will not pass if .

Both the online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and second chances, but online and organization complaints hold her back.

; the online review would not take her again online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Students report , and cheat sheets that soften grade risk.

Format shift

Leniency ; online student withdrew.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Lots of homework and test-heavy structure keep the .

Format shift

; online comment focused more on chaos than volume.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Caring and , but and logistics complaints lower the experience.

Format shift

In person is stronger; online Zoom delivery was poorly received.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Frequent homework plus quizzes and .

Format shift

and homework; online review gave little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often praised as caring and willing to help, with redoes and , though .

Main concern

, and occasional disorganization in lectures and materials.

What students said

“An amazing professor! I took her class in the Summer:). if you dont understand.”
MATH52456
“i didnt pass her class but she gave me alot of ”
MATH62
“So unorganized. Often forgot quizzes, didn't have enough copies of assignment for the class”
PRESTATISTIC062

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One COVID-era online review called her a good teacher but and .

Main concern

and complicated class flow during remote teaching.

What students said

“good teacher, but . Took her class during the covid 19 and she did not know how to use the zoom meetings”
MATH130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

redoes and occasional cheat sheets rather than strict high-stakes only exams.

No multiple choice on quizzes/testsExam redoesPop quizzesSmall cheat sheets

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, quizzes and , and redoes or small cheat sheets are sometimes allowed.

No multiple choicePop quizzesExam redoesCheat sheets
“ so make sure You remember everything and don't study the night before!”
MATH52456
“She if majority of the class has done bad all and she wants them to understand the material better.”
MATH62

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i didnt pass her class but she gave me alot of chances to,redoing test/quizes EC,small cheat sheets , etc only failed cuz im lazy/”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (1 online, 4 in , and organization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“She is a great teacher and she is always willing to help her students when they need help.”

📝 Second Chances

78/100

“she gave me alot of ”

📂 Organization Issues

35/100

“So unorganized. Often forgot quizzes, didn't have enough copies of assignment for the class”

👍 Recommendation Split

62/100

“ but not online.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will go back to make sure you understand.
  • always willing to help her students when they need help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework but its very easy make sure to do them for .
  • Allowed class to retake exams after more than 50% of the class failed.
  • Don't know how I got an A, math isn't my strong subject.

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • but not online.
  • she did not know how to use the zoom meetings

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2018-2020 with mixed grades and consistent themes, but only one online review and limited grade detail.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH622 reviews
MATH1301 review
MATH524561 review
PRESTATISTIC0621 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1