AI Rate Professor

Economics

Dezzie Prewitt

ECON102 · BUSC1B · ECON101 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
57.89%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take him if you will attend, do homework, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderCaring When EngagedShort-Answer ExamsLots of HomeworkMixed Online Experience
  • , and transfer-ready; others call tests brutal and .
  • Attendance and effort often save the .
  • Online and accelerated and harsh low grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many report easy A's with notes or , but others fail .

Online reviews more often cite free materials and retakes; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard intro econ but paced hard in short terms, with graphs and short answers raising intellectual load.

Both formats report moderate concepts; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and tags warn skip class and you will not pass, though a few say it was flexible.

; in-person more strongly links presence to points.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and care; the other half warn hard grading and worthless lectures.

Online is more split extreme; in-person has both transfer-praise and GPA-ruin stories.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear criteria and effort curves help some, but and D/F outcomes .

Format shift

Online has both caring makeups and whole-class low grades; .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lots of homework and reading appear often, yet some terms have light or .

Format shift

Online weekly multi-part assignments recur; .

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Praise for funny real-world lectures competes with frequent notes-all-over-the-place and useless-review complaints.

Format shift

Positive online office-hour stories contrast with some online non-communication horror stories.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and finals, with , and occasional group projects as support.

Format shift

Online often mixes quizzes, discussions, and untimed midterms; in-person leans short-answer and graph tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students split between inspirational lectures with cheat sheets and easy-pass effort .

Main concern

and can be graph-heavy short answers.

What students said

“Pay attention in class and .”
ECON101
“ , but the lecture is completely all over the place.”
ECON101

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections range from best-at-Rio praise with free texts and and poor communication.

Main concern

A subset of online students report class-wide low grades and zero responsiveness.

What students said

“ so far at Rio.”
ECON101
“My entire class was graded low, not communicated with and struggled”
ECON101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; some terms allow a notes page or practice exams, others feel misaligned.

Short Answer ExamsGraph ProblemsCheat Sheet SometimesPractice ExamsGroup Project Final

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and charts, sometimes with a cheat sheet or review session.

Short AnswerGraphs and ChartsCheat Sheet AllowedNo Multiple Choice
“ and charts and fill in questions.”
ECON102
“He allows a page of notes for exams, which if B's.”
ECON101

Online

Online students , and sometimes a group-project final.

Untimed MidtermsPractice ExamsWeekly QuizzesGroup Project Final
“He had 2 midterm exams with no time limit in 16 weeks. .”
ECON101
“Also he gave practice exams to prepare you for the test.”
ECON101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take his class if you want to transfer. Actually one of the better instructors at Rio.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Actually one of the better instructors at Rio.”

⚖️

48/100

“Grades way too harshly, I and ended up with a C.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“ . I made the and .”

❤️ Care and Access

70/100

“When I talked to him after class, he helped me find a job at Rio.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Cracks a few jokes every day
  • His real world examples are hilarious
  • and unstable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ....all short answers
  • easy A. He reviews what will be on the test
  • as long as he sees you put in effort he will pass you

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • so far at Rio
  • Don't buy the book because everything is online already

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-three reviews span roughly a decade with , and both online and in-person coverage.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ECON10134 reviews
ECON1028 reviews
BUSC1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

27 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

3

C 3

D range

4

D+ 1 · D 2 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1