AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Geoffrey McWilliams

MATH73 · MATH030 · MATH073 · MATH30 · MATH050 · MATH219 · MATH70 · MATH070 · MATH130 · MATH50 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will attend every class and do the work; skip if you need an easy no-effort A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Math TeachingDaily QuizzesGroup WorkTough GraderMandatory Attendance
  • Most students praise clear, patient lectures that demystify developmental math
  • Daily quizzes, weekly homework, and
  • Grades reward consistent effort more than natural talent

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is possible with and homework, but lazy students fail and partial credit is tight.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is developmental math made and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as and skip-class-fail tags.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

if they commit to showing up and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Many call him fair, but and zero partial credit on wrong setups hurt some grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and group work create a steady high load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Clear PowerPoints, humor, and of complaints.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly love his clear, funny teaching and group work, but , and mandatory attendance.

Main concern

Missing class or half-effort homework tanks the grade quickly under strict partial-credit rules.

What students said

“I hated math until I met Geoff! I got an A thanks to his class!”
MATH50
“if you put in effort you will get an A like I did! Dont miss or youll fall behind”
MATH73
“If youre not good . as well as group work.”
MATH50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and can feel long or stricter than study guides.

Long ExamsDaily QuizzesPop QuizzesStudy Guide Mismatch Risk

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

pop quizzes; some report study guides poorly match tests.

Long ExamsDaily QuizzesPop QuizzesTough Partial Credit
“ .”
MATH219
“ .”
MATH73
“his study guide had no connection with so ever!”
MATH130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I hated math until I met Geoff! I got an A thanks to his class! I wish he would be my professor for all math classes! , and overall the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 in-person reviews, highlighting clear and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

78/100

“He explained everything very easily and I proudly passed with an 82%.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“He did give a tremendous amount of homework.”

🚪

18/100

“Going to class is mandatory I would of gotten a better grade if I attended more”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes math easy and .
  • Great lectures! Group work helps a lot and and help out.
  • and if you dont understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you put in effort you will get an A like I did!
  • Your answers must be 100% right in order to get any credit.
  • Do all your work, attend class, and you'll get a passing grade.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload & Rules

  • as well as group work.
  • , so it makes it harder to understand the subject.
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews across many years show detailed, mostly consistent themes with a .

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH509 reviews
MATH705 reviews
MATH304 reviews
MATH734 reviews
MATH0703 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH0302 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH0501 review
MATH0731 review
MATH2191 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1