AI Rate Professor

English & Literature

Michelle Nava

ENG35 · ENG201 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you will read and ; expect .

Best fit · Effort For RewardApproachable English ProfGreat FeedbackTough but FairInteractive ClassesExtra Credit
  • , and interactive teaching.
  • She is a , but and specific comments help you improve.
  • One outlier calls the class boring; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with reading and revision, but she is a and you must work for the mark you want.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is approachable and interactive, though reading and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory; only one student reported it as optional.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Three of four students would take her again and call her approachable and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tough grader tags appear often, but and keep grading constructive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lots of short papers and reading; manageable if you stay current.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students repeatedly praise approachability, illustrations, and interactive lessons.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and in-class work more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English classes feel interactive and papers and , though one student found it boring.

Main concern

and if you fall behind.

What students said

“THE !”
ENG201
“relatively an easy class but you have to work for the grade you want.”
ENG35
“Class is super boring.”
ENG201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and .

MidtermPapersExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on short papers and ; few details on proctoring.

MidtermPapersExtra Credit
“Started The . MAKE SURE YOU READ.”
ENG35
“ and opportunities during class meetings”
ENG201

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I hate English but she actually made it enjoyable. if you can!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting feedback style, workload, and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Nava is so approachable and helpful.”

👍 Recommendation

75/100

“ ”

📝 Feedback and Grades

48/100

“She grades very specifically but it actually helps”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“lots of papers but they're really short.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes her classes very interactive and gives great illustrations
  • The way she teaches makes English a fun and interactive class
  • Class is super boring.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • relatively an easy class but you have to work for the grade you want.
  • She is a but

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • , and keeps its real.
  • very understanding and actually wants her students to do well.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only four in-person reviews from 2017-2018, mostly consistent but a small sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG2013 reviews
ENG351 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values