AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Phat Truong

ACCT201 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Only if you need a low-effort accounting seat and can tolerate a dull lecturer.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBoring lecturesVery easy courseWould take againMandatory attendance
  • Only one dated review rates quality 5 but calls the teacher boring.
  • Course content is rated extremely easy (difficulty 1).
  • ; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Difficulty was rated 1 with .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Student rated difficulty 1 and described the class as okay and easy.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No grade or .

Format shift

In-person only; no online evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload was not described beyond an easy overall class.

Format shift

In-person only; no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Quality rated 5 but the only comment is that the teacher is boring.

Format shift

In-person only; no online evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

In-person only; no online evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Single in-person ACCT201 review: easy class, .

Main concern

Thin evidence from one old review; lecture engagement is poor.

What students said

“okay class. teacher is boring”
ACCT201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring for ACCT201.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“okay class. teacher is boring”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review; credibility Low due to tiny sample and sparse detail.

😴 Lecture Energy

40/100

“okay class. teacher is boring”

📗 Course Ease

88/100

“okay class. teacher is boring”

🔁

62/100

“Yes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • okay class. teacher is boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2018 review with almost no detail on grades, workload, or exams.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values