AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cynthia Andrade

MATH175 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid Cynthia Andrade for MATH175 unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRepeated lecture mistakesTough testsMass dropoutLecture heavyAvoid for math
  • Only one review paints a disastrous MATH175 experience with mass dropouts and failures.
  • Teaching method failed even strong math students and repeated lesson errors.
  • Tough tests plus skip-class-you-fail dynamic with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Student dropped/withdrew, reported mass failures, and .

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Difficulty rated 5/5 with a teaching method that did not accommodate students and left most failing.

All evidence is from one in-person MATH175 review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

, but tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Would not take again; described as the .

Recommendation signal is solely from the one in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

, and high failure among remaining students signal harsh grading.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lecture-heavy course with and a skip-class-you-fail warning implies heavy study load.

Format shift

Workload inferred from the single in-person MATH175 review.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Repeated mistakes in lessons and a method that failed even strong math students.

Format shift

Teaching quality judged from the only in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and comments emphasize .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One in-person MATH175 review describes repeated lesson mistakes, ~35 students shrinking to ~10, and half of remaining students failing.

Main concern

Teaching method does not accommodate students and .

What students said

“I took her Fall 2017 and it was the .”
MATH175
“There were about 35 students and by the end there were only 10 and half of them ended up failing.”
MATH175

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as tough in a high-stakes, lecture-heavy math class with high failure risk.

Tough testsLecture heavySkip class you won't pass

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person MATH175 features tough tests and a high-stakes lecture-heavy setup with .

Tough testsIn-person math examsHigh failure risk
“ ”
MATH175
“half of them ended up failing”
MATH175

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took her Fall 2017 and it was the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“her teaching method didn't accommodate any student”

📉 Mass Dropout Risk

8/100

“There were about 35 students and by the end there were only 10 and half of them ended up failing”

🚫

5/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • teaching method didn't accommodate any student
  • over-repeated mistakes in her lessons is not okay

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • half of them ended up failing
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2018 review exists, so signal is vivid but sample size and recency limit confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1751 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1