AI Rate Professor

Education

Cecilia Medina

CDEC112 · CD211 · CD110 · CD111 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

if you follow directions carefully, but know experiences are not uniformly positive.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear grading criteriaGroup projectsTake-home finalAttendance mandatoryMixed reviews
  • , and easy courses.
  • One strong negative review cites belittling, last-minute cancels, and a .
  • Attendance and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Several students describe breezy courses with group tests and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Most call the content light and manageable, with reading and in-class projects rather than heavy theory.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and in-class group work is due the same day.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but one very negative experience pulls the overall confidence down.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Clear criteria and group assessments help, but .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Students report manageable work with textbook-based assignments and in-class group projects.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Several call her great and clear, but a minority report disrespectful tone and poor communication.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of textbook assignments, in-class group projects, midterms, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person education and CD classes are usually easy with and group work, though one review reports a .

Main concern

At least one section felt disrespectful and poorly managed around a .

What students said

“ and as clear as water.”
CD111
“ !!!! 2/3s of class didn't .”
CDEC112
“group tests and ask for”
CD111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and take-home finals, with one conflicting hard midterm report.

Group testsTake-home finalClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mention group tests and ; one review also reports a .

Group testsTake-home finalMidterm reported as hard in one section
“group tests and ask for”
CD111
“2/3s of class didn't . 1/3 of class failed.”
CDEC112

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and as clear as water.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, balancing clear positive patterns with one strong negative outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Medina is a great professor, You must have the textbook in order to complete the assignments.”

⚠️ Negative Experience

30/100

“ !!!! 2/3s of class didn't .”

👍 Easy Format

78/100

“group tests and ask for, I learned a lot in class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is really nice teacher
  • Mrs. Medina is such a good teacher
  • Belittles students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • CD 211 was a breeze for me

Theme 3

📝 About Assessment

  • Her lesson plans are in class group projects and are due by the end of class time
  • group tests and
  • Cancels class and tells us the morning with little notice

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews with one strong outlier reduce consistency, even though .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CD1112 reviews
CD1101 review
CD2111 review
CDEC1121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1