AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Subhash Malakar

MTH70 · MATHMATH · MATH30 · MATH050 · MATH70 · MATH070 · MA70 · MATH130 · MATH50 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you will attend , and can handle hard short-answer exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingLecture heavyHard short-answer testsLots of homeworkAccent hard to follow
  • some say he made them love math; many call him the .
  • , and can dominate the grade.
  • Homework and ; and you will likely fail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A and ; several students report Ds, fails, or only passing because they already knew the material.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High , and lecture-heavy pacing make content feel tough for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple tags and comments say skip class and you will not .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About two-thirds would take him again among those who answered, but many detailed .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Partial credit is sometimes given, but and students report harsh outcomes including Ds and fails.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of and treated as mandatory if you plan to pass.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Some call him helpful, fair, and clarity-building; many , and hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students report short-answer hard problems and only a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person math courses feel lecture-heavy with ; dedicated students who do homework can pass, while and unhelpful.

Main concern

, and high fail or drop rates for unprepared students.

What students said

“I attended every lecture, took extensive notes but still did not understand the material.”
MATH130
“As long as you do your homework before him teaching the material then you should be fine.”
MATH130
“ and he selects the hardest problems from the .”
MATH070

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

toughest problems, sometimes with partial credit but little student-friendly structure.

Short answerHardest chapter problemsIn-person testsPartial credit sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

chapter problems, and can drive most of the course grade.

Short answerHardest chapter problemsIn-person testsPartial credit sometimes
“ and he selects the hardest problems from the .”
MATH070
“60% of your grade comes from the tests. and only 5% is homework.”
MTH70

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and he selects the hardest problems from the . You will not learn!”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews over , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

📝

32/100

“ and he selects the hardest problems from the .”

📚

30/100

“ if you plan to pass. You cannot slack if you want to pass this class!!!!”

🔀 Polarized Teaching

42/100

“Made me LOVE math! You have to do your work to pass his class. Helpful and clear.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Class is BORING and confusing.Every day is a lecture
  • Made me LOVE math!
  • Very hard to understand because of his accent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 60% of your grade comes from the tests. and only 5% is homework.
  • I was an A student and got a D in this class.
  • the but he will give yo partial credit

Theme 3

⚠️ Warnings

  • !!!!!! !!!!
  • This is the worst professor at Rio Hondo College.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across many years and courses show and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH704 reviews
MATH0703 reviews
MATH1302 reviews
MATH302 reviews
MA701 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH0501 review
MATH501 review
MATHMATH1 review
MTH701 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Fail 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1