AI Rate Professor

Art

Joe Cramer

ART140 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you want a , but help quality can feel uneven.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKind and knowledgeableHands-off ceramics styleBeginner-friendly adviceProject-focusedHit-or-miss help
  • Two of three reviews praise him as caring and .
  • One strong negative says he does not teach and just throws board notes for exams.
  • Difficulty ratings are very low; and studying for a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Projects are described as easy and overall difficulty is very low, so an A mainly means finishing work and studying a .

All evidence is from in-person ART140 reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students rate difficulty 1-2 and frame ceramics work as .

All evidence is from in-person ART140 reviews; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

80/100

; others do not stress strict attendance.

; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two and a favorite, but one strongly prefers another instructor instead.

All recommendation tone .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

No tough-grader complaints; low difficulty and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person ART140 comments.

Workload

Light

76/100

Students describe easy projects plus a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person ART140 comments.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority call him kind, knowledgeable, and helpful, though one review says he barely teaches.

Format shift

Based only on in-person ART140 comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Studio projects drive the class, with a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person ART140 comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ART140 ceramics feels low-difficulty with easy projects and a ; students split on whether he actively teaches or mostly works at his own wheel.

Main concern

Some students feel ignored and say board notes replace real instruction.

What students said

“Great Artist! He truly cares about students. Very helpful!! well!”
ART140
“He doesn't teach anything to his ceramics students, he just writes stuff on the board and expects you to remember it for the exam!”
ART140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students mention a projects.

In-person examBoard notesProjects plus exam

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

for after board notes, plus easy projects.

In-person examBoard notesModerate exam difficulty
“ well!”
ART140
“he just writes stuff on the board and expects you to remember it for the exam!”
ART140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great Artist! He truly cares about students. Very helpful!! well! Favorite professor by far!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2012-2015, highlighting mixed help quality and low difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Prof. Cramer is a ... he was willing to provide practical, artistic advice to me.”

⚠️ Hands-Off Help

40/100

“ !! He doesn't teach anything to his ceramics students... Definitely taking Mr. Miller instead next semester.”

📈 Easy Studio Path

78/100

“ well! Favorite professor by far!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • willing to provide practical, artistic advice
  • He doesn't teach anything to his ceramics students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ]
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1
  • you'll do well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews from 2012-2015 with mixed opinions and little grade or .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART1403 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values