AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Denysse Clark

COUNS151 · COUN101 · HUSER121 · ALLHUSRCLASSE · COUN151 · HUSER124 · HUSR122 · HUSER118 · HUSER122 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a interactive group classes.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and compassionateGroup-activity focusedEthical counselor styleLife-impacting classesInspirational mentor
  • Students repeatedly praise her care, ethics, and personal interest in their growth.
  • Human services and counseling courses feel engaging through group work and real-world resources.
  • Show up, participate, and work hard to succeed; a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two reported As and moderate difficulty, but students stress showing up, working hard, and .

Both the online A and most in-person comments point to effort plus participation rather than a free A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Average difficulty is mild and some material is called common sense, though creativity and tests can still challenge students.

Online and group activities.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

, but multiple comments say show up and participate to succeed.

Evidence is almost entirely in-person; the one online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and life-changing counseling classes.

Online and detail from in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Reported As and warm mentoring tone suggest .

Format shift

Grade detail is sparse overall; both formats lean positive rather than punitive.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Group activities, participation, and career-style projects .

Format shift

In-person reviews describe activity-heavy classes; the online review also highlights group work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

Students overwhelmingly describe a older low ratings.

Format shift

Online praise matches the dominant in-person mentor narrative.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of group activities, participation, projects, and .

Format shift

and projects; online detail is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students call her inspirational, ethical, and invested in personal growth, with fun group-based classes.

Main concern

A minority say tests can feel hard or .

What students said

“Wish all teachers were as caring and compassionate. Great class, great resources”
HUSER118
“She has really designed a class that has greatly impacted my life--educationally and personally.”
HUSR122
“ because she wants you to be original and creative. .”
HUSER122

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Single online student found her caring, non-boring, and strong with group activities across her HUSER courses.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online rigor and .

What students said

“She cares a lot about her students and her classes are not boring! Does a lot of group activities! !”
HUSER121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews rarely detail proctoring; a few students call tests hard and creativity-oriented.

Some hard testsCreativity-focused assessmentLimited exam policy detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and reward originality more than rote answers.

Tests kind of hardOriginal and creative work
“ because she wants you to be original and creative. .”
HUSER122

Online

review.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has really designed a class that has greatly impacted my life--educationally and personally.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (1 online, 14 in person), highlighting care, group work, and moderate effort for success. Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Caring Mentorship

84/100

“Wish all teachers were as caring and compassionate. Great class, great resources”

👍 Strong Recommendations

86/100

“ !”

👥 Group-Based Learning

78/100

“Loved her teaching methods and did many group activities. Fun classes!!”

⚖️ Effort Still Matters

58/100

“Show up every day and work hard and you will also have sucess in her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Takes a great interest in her students
  • Does a lot of group activities
  • Shes very ethical and I would like to be as wonderful and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • A majority of the material is common sense
  • Show up every day and work hard and you will also have sucess

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • My inspirational teacher
  • Very warm loving caring teacher
  • I wish all my teachers were as great as her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews spanning many years give a consistent caring-teacher theme, but grades and and some comments are old.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HUSER1224 reviews
HUSER1243 reviews
COUN1012 reviews
ALLHUSRCLASSE1 review
COUN1511 review
Show 4 more courses
COUNS1511 review
HUSER1181 review
HUSER1211 review
HUSR1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values