AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Debra Vance

POLYS110 · POLITICALSCI1 · POLS110 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; every review is a strong warning about teaching and grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAvoidHard TestsNo TeachingMonotoneDisorganized Online
  • All four reviews rate quality 1 with extreme difficulty and
  • Lectures are monologues or off-topic while
  • Online and ignored emails, leading to withdrawal

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Tests are described as over-the-top hard with , and no .

Both formats are harshly negative; online failure was about missing .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

5/100

Students call content and testing extreme, with dense textbook exams and heavy paper requirements.

; the online review focuses on zero instructional delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Reviews and focus instead on poor teaching and .

comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every , and DONT TAKE HER with zero positive counterpoints.

Online and in-person students independently warn others to stay away.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

, and grades tied to dense book detail.

Format shift

Harshness is explicit in in-person reviews; .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Frequent 100-question tests after multi-chapter reading plus an eight-page research paper.

Format shift

In-person workload is extreme; online students got no assignments posted at all.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students say she drones, teaches opinions instead of the book, goes off topic, and fails to post online work.

Format shift

; online complaint centers on total non-delivery.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Frequent high-stakes textbook tests dominate, with a long research paper and little helpful teaching support.

Format shift

; online never reached normal assessment because work was unposted.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

personal opinions while exams demand full textbook mastery.

Main concern

Extremely hard 100-question tests with no study .

What students said

“she doesn't teach, she drones on for , and expects you to know every single sentence of every chapter of the textbook.”
POLS110
“ . AVOID”
POLS110
“need to read 4 chapters then a test each yest is 100 questions no study guides and 8 page research paper.”
POLITICALSCI1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online section left students without posted assignments, unanswered emails, and forced withdrawal.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“2 weeks passed the then she said she would post them in a few days never did & kept repeating & never replied to emails”
POLYS110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

guides; one final was even described as geography instead of course content.

100-Question TestsNo Study GuidesTextbook-Only ExamsResearch Paper

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are extremely hard, often 100 questions from dense textbook chapters with no study guides.

100-Question TestsNo Study GuidesTextbook-Only ExamsResearch Paper
“ . AVOID”
POLS110
“each yest is 100 questions no study guides and 8 page research paper.”
POLITICALSCI1
“teaches a pols .”
POLS110

Online

Online because assignments were never posted and the student withdrew.

No Assignments Posted
“2 weeks passed the ”
POLYS110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“AVOID”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 in-person, 1 online), all uniformly negative on teaching and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster

8/100

“she doesn't teach, she drones on for ”

🚫

5/100

“ ”

📝 Brutal Exams

15/100

“ .”

💻 Online Failure

8/100

“never replied to emails”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she drones on for
  • Monotone.Gets off topic
  • she laughed at her own jokes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • expects you to know every single sentence of every chapter of the textbook
  • each yest is 100 questions no study guides
  • No

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • she never even posted any
  • never replied to emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, all from late 2013, but they are detailed and perfectly consistent at quality 1 and difficulty 5.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

POLS1102 reviews
POLITICALSCI11 review
POLYS1101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1