AI Rate Professor

Computer & Informational Tech.

Charles Hughes

CIV140 · CIT101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if ; existing reviews point to weak teaching with little redeeming detail.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor explanationsHard course feelVery few reviewsLow quality scoresNot recommended
  • Both reviews rate teaching quality low.
  • One student explicitly says he is not good at explaining.
  • Sample is tiny and sparse, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

High difficulty ratings and no easy-A language suggest grades are not easy freebies.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Average difficulty is high and one review rates difficulty at 5 with no counterbalancing ease comments.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Low quality scores and the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

No evidence of ; difficulty is rated high and comments are negative.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Workload is not described; only difficulty and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students give low quality scores and state he is not good at explaining.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but negative, with low quality scores and a direct complaint about unclear explanations.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Not good at explaining.”
CIV140

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not good at explaining.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews with consistently low quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Not good at explaining.”

👎 Recommendation

18/100

“Not good at explaining.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not good at explaining.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not good at explaining.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two sparse reviews years apart, one with no comment text and both low quality.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIT1011 review
CIV1401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values