AI Rate Professor

Marketing

Eric Caeser

BUS101 · MRKT174 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

In person he looks great, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging discussionsAI grading crackdownLight homeworkEntertaining lecturesSplit online vs in-person
  • and light, flexible homework.
  • A recent online review warns of .
  • Experience quality appears to differ sharply between online and in-person formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

In , but online AI checks raise real failure risk.

In person feels easy; online evidence warns AI detection can fail you.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

Difficulty ratings are low and as light and flexible.

Both formats rate difficulty low, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

The as mandatory; older in-person reviews do not clarify.

; in-person reviews do not detail policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Older in-person students love him, but the recent .

; the online review strongly advises against.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

, but online AI checks can fail partially flagged work.

Format shift

In person sounds lenient; online sounds harsh due to AI checks.

Workload

Light

80/100

Students say and can be finished early for the whole semester.

Format shift

Workload comments come mainly from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Engaging discussions and entertaining lectures earn high praise, undercut by one scathing online review.

Format shift

In-person teaching is praised; online experience is strongly criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and now AI-checked submissions online.

Format shift

In person emphasizes discussions and light HW; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students praise engaging discussions, entertaining lectures, and .

Main concern

Older reviews may .

What students said

“Excellent professor! He engages everyone in !”
BUS101
“totally a kool guy. respects everyones comments and questions.”
MRKT174

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Recent online MRKT174 review is harshly negative over AI-check grading that can fail partly flagged work.

Main concern

Heavy reliance on AI detection can tank grades even when only part of work is flagged.

What students said

“Will base his grade on AI check and even if most of it is not flagged and only a part will fail you.”
MRKT174

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, while online grading leans heavily on AI detection.

Tests reviewed beforehandLight homeworkAI check grading

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and discussion-based learning.

Tests reviewed beforehandLight homeworkGroup discussions
“he reviews the and doesn't assign an insane amount of homework”
BUS101

Online

fail work even when only part is flagged.

AI check gradingFail on partial flags
“Will base his grade on AI check and even if most of it is not flagged and only a part will fail you.”
MRKT174

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Will base his grade on AI check and even if most of it is not flagged and only a part will fail you. as no instructor functions heavily on AI as he does.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in-person), and teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🤖

20/100

“Will base his grade on AI check and even if most of it is not flagged and only a part will fail you.”

🗣️ Engaging Teaching

90/100

“Excellent professor! He engages everyone in !”

📚 Light Workload

80/100

“doesn't assign an insane amount of for the entire semester as early as you'd like!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • engages everyone in
  • and lectures are very entertaining
  • totally a kool guy. respects everyones comments and questions

Theme 2

⚠️

  • Will base his grade on AI check
  • even if most of it is not flagged and only a part will fail you

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • doesn't assign an insane amount of homework
  • complete hw for the entire semester as early as you'd like
  • he reviews the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews total with a sharp online-vs-in-person split and mostly old in-person feedback plus one very recent online complaint.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MRKT1742 reviews
BUS1011 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1